When force quitting, we need to block on the pending writes to ensure
that write commands succeed before exiting, and also to avoid a crash
when all the views are gone before the auto format call returns from
the LS.
* Autosave all when the terminal loses focus
* Correct comment on focus config
Co-authored-by: Blaž Hrastnik <blaz@mxxn.io>
* Need a block_try_flush_writes in all quit_all paths
Co-authored-by: Blaž Hrastnik <blaz@mxxn.io>
If a document is written with a new path, currently, in the event that
the write fails, the document still gets its path changed. This fixes
it so that the path is not updated unless the write succeeds.
The way that document writes are handled are by submitting them to the
async job pool, which are all executed opportunistically out of order. It
was discovered that this can lead to write inconsistencies when there
are multiple writes to the same file in quick succession.
This seeks to fix this problem by removing document writes from the
general pool of jobs and into its own specialized event. Now when a
user submits a write with one of the write commands, a request is simply
queued up in a new mpsc channel that each Document makes to handle its own
writes. This way, if multiple writes are submitted on the same document,
they are executed in order, while still allowing concurrent writes for
different documents.
Instead of repeatedly checking if it is in_bounds, calculate the
max_indent beforehand and just loop. I added a debug_assert to "prove"
that it never tries drawing out of bounds.
Better performance, and otherwise very long lines with lots of tabs
will wrap around the u16 and come back on the other side, messing up
the beginning skip_levels.
Also changes workspace diagnostic picker bindings to <space>D and
changes the debug menu keybind to <space>g, the previous diagnostic
picker keybind. This brings the diagnostic picker bindings more in
line with the jump to next/previous diagnostic bindings which are
currently on ]d and [d.
The debug assertion that document diagnostics are sorted incorrectly
panics for cases like `[161..164, 162..162]`. The merging behavior
in the following lines that relies on the assertion only needs the
input ranges to be sorted by `range.start`, so this change simplifies
the assertion to only catch violations of that assumption.
