When we do auto formatting, the code that takes the LSP's response and applies
the changes to the document are just getting the currently focused view and
giving that to the function, basically always assuming that the document that
we're applying the change to is in focus, and not in a background view.
This is usually fine for a single view, even if it's a buffer in the
background, because it's still the same view and the selection will get updated
accordingly for when you switch back to it. But it's obviously a problem for
when there are multiple views, because if you don't have the target document in
focus, it will ask the document to update the wrong view, hence the crash.
The problem with this is picking which view to apply any selection change to.
In the absence of any more data points on the views themselves, we simply pick
the first view associated with the document we are saving.
When force quitting, we need to block on the pending writes to ensure
that write commands succeed before exiting, and also to avoid a crash
when all the views are gone before the auto format call returns from
the LS.
* Autosave all when the terminal loses focus
* Correct comment on focus config
Co-authored-by: Blaž Hrastnik <blaz@mxxn.io>
* Need a block_try_flush_writes in all quit_all paths
Co-authored-by: Blaž Hrastnik <blaz@mxxn.io>
* Fix test::print for Unicode
The print function was not generating correct translations when
the input has Unicode (non-ASCII) in it. This is due to its use of
String::len, which gives the length in bytes, not chars.
* Fix multi-code point auto pairs
The current code for auto pairs is counting offsets by summing the
length of the open and closing chars with char::len_utf8. Unfortunately,
this gives back bytes, and the offset needs to be in chars.
Additionally, it was discovered that there was a preexisting bug where
the selection was not computed correctly in the case that the cursor
was:
1. a single grapheme in width
2. this grapheme was more than one char
3. the direction of the cursor is backwards
4. a secondary range
In this case, the offset was not being added into the anchor. This was
fixed.
* migrate auto pairs tests to integration
* review comments
This change removes language server configuration from the default
languages.toml config for integration tests. No integration-tests
currently depend on the availability of a language server but if any
future test needs to, it may provide a language server configuration
by passing an override into the `test_syntax_conf` helper.
Language-servers in integration tests cause false-positive failures
when running integration tests in GitHub Actions CI. The Windows
runner appears to have `clangd` installed and all OS runners have
the `R` binary installed but not the `R` language server package.
If a test file created by `tempfile::NamedTempFile` happens to have a
file extension of `r`, the test will most likely fail because the
R language server will fail to start and will become a broken pipe,
meaning that it will fail to shutdown within the timeout, causing a
false-positive failure. This happens surprisingly often in practice.
Language servers (especially rust-analyzer) also emit unnecessary
log output when initializing, which this change silences.
`helix_view::apply_transaction` closes over `Document::apply` and
`View::apply` to ensure that jumplist entries are updated when a
document changes from a transaction. `Document::apply` shouldn't
be called directly - this helper function should be used instead.
If a document is written with a new path, currently, in the event that
the write fails, the document still gets its path changed. This fixes
it so that the path is not updated unless the write succeeds.
The way that document writes are handled are by submitting them to the
async job pool, which are all executed opportunistically out of order. It
was discovered that this can lead to write inconsistencies when there
are multiple writes to the same file in quick succession.
This seeks to fix this problem by removing document writes from the
general pool of jobs and into its own specialized event. Now when a
user submits a write with one of the write commands, a request is simply
queued up in a new mpsc channel that each Document makes to handle its own
writes. This way, if multiple writes are submitted on the same document,
they are executed in order, while still allowing concurrent writes for
different documents.
