This partially reverts c41b2c73ef: for the
sake of consistency, the title of a release should always be a link,
whether it's a tag-only release or not.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
Update the `TestTagViewWithoutRelease` test case with another assert:
one that checks that the release title is properly displayed.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
- When a user goes opens a symlink file in Forgejo, the file would be
rendered with the path of the symlink as content.
- Add a button that is shown when the user opens a *valid* symlink file,
which means that the symlink must have an valid path to an existent
file and after 999 follows isn't a symlink anymore.
- Return the relative path from the `FollowLink` functions, because Git
really doesn't want to tell where an file is located based on the blob ID.
- Adds integration tests.
- Implement the commit mail selection feature for the other supported
Git operations that can be done trough the web UI.
- Adds integration tests (goodluck reviewing this).
- Ref: #1788
Co-authored-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
- The CODEOWNER feature relies on the changed files to determine which
reviewers should be added according to the `CODEOWNER` file.
- The current approach was to 'diff' between the base and head branch,
which seems logical but fail in practice when the pull request is out of
date with the base branch. Therefore it should instead diff between the
head branch and the merge base of the head and base branch, so only the
actual affected files by the pull requests are used, the same approach
is used by the diff of an unmerged pull request.
- Add integration testing (for the feature as well).
- Resolves#2458
In #2445, I lifted out the fork button into its own template, but did
not update it properly. This resulted in the fork button's counter not
displaying, and pointing to the wrong place too.
This patch updates the template to account for it moving to a separate
file, and also adds test cases to verify the button is display as it
should be.
Fixes#2494.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
When viewing a tag that isn't associated with a release, highlight the
"N Tags" sub-menu item, rather than the "M releases" one.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
The `repo.SingleRelease` handler was broken by gitea#29149, as the
switch to `getReleaseInfos` stopped returning tags without an associated
release. This resulted in the web UI showing a 404 when trying to view a
tag without a release.
This restores the functionality by explicitly including tags in the
search, and also adds tests to exercise the fix.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
Fix#14459
The following users can add/remove review requests of a PR
- the poster of the PR
- the owner or collaborators of the repository
- members with read permission on the pull requests unit
(cherry picked from commit c42083a33950be6ee9f822c6d0de3c3a79d1f51b)
Conflicts:
models/repo/repo_list_test.go
tests/integration/api_nodeinfo_test.go
tests/integration/api_repo_test.go
shared fixture counts
Fixes the reason why #29101 is hard to replicate.
Related #29297
Create a repo with a file with minimum size 4097 bytes (I use 10000) and
execute the following code:
```go
gitRepo, err := gitrepo.OpenRepository(db.DefaultContext, <repo>)
assert.NoError(t, err)
commit, err := gitRepo.GetCommit(<sha>)
assert.NoError(t, err)
entry, err := commit.GetTreeEntryByPath(<file>)
assert.NoError(t, err)
b := entry.Blob()
// Create a reader
r, err := b.DataAsync()
assert.NoError(t, err)
defer r.Close()
// Create a second reader
r2, err := b.DataAsync()
assert.NoError(t, err) // Should be no error but is ErrNotExist
defer r2.Close()
```
The problem is the check in `CatFileBatch`:
79217ea63c/modules/git/repo_base_nogogit.go (L81-L87)
`Buffered() > 0` is used to check if there is a "operation" in progress
at the moment. This is a problem because we can't control the internal
buffer in the `bufio.Reader`. The code above demonstrates a sequence
which initiates an operation for which the code thinks there is no
active processing. The second call to `DataAsync()` therefore reuses the
existing instances instead of creating a new batch reader.
(cherry picked from commit f74c869221624092999097af38b6f7fae4701420)
Similarly to how `[repository].DISABLE_FORKS` works, lets make
`[repository].DISABLE_STARS` disable the routes too, not just hide the
functionality from the UI.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
- If the user is searching repositories with an specific topic, adding
any other filter option, such as showing unrelevant repositories or
using another sort Forgejo should remember that 'topic only' was set.
- Adds integration test.
- Resolves#2461
If a documentation file is marked with a `linguist-documentation=false`
attribute, include it in language stats.
However, make sure that we do *not* include documentation languages as
fallback.
Added a new test case to exercise the formerly buggy behaviour.
Problem discovered while reviewing @KN4CK3R's tests from gitea#29267.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
- If a user tries to create another protected branching rule that
specifies a set of branches already used by another rule, do not allow
it.
- Update the translation accordingly.
- Adds integration test.
- Resolves#2455
For small, personal self-hosted instances with no user signups, the fork
button is just a noise. This patch allows disabling them like stars can
be disabled too.
Disabling forks does not only remove the buttons from the web UI, it
also disables the routes that could be used to create forks.
Fixes#2441.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
- Check if someone is (accidentally) trying to create a pull request via
AGit with changes already in the target branch and fail if that is the
case.
- Added integration test.
Adds a label to Pull Requests that were created using AGit-Flow,
in order to prevent situations where a contributor uses AGit-Flow
to push new changes - only to realize that they did not use AGit-Flow
in the first place, and that they just opened a new PR accidentally
(that was me).
Also intended to raise general awareness about the feature. Some
additional work, such as adding a tooltip, still needs to be
done.
A small typo fix for a comment and (exclusively) formatting fixes
in the copyright header are also included.
Refs: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/2433
- The ambiguous character detection is an important security feature to
combat against sourcebase attacks (https://trojansource.codes/).
- However there are a few problems with the feature as it stands
today (i) it's apparantly an big performance hitter, it's twice as slow
as syntax highlighting (ii) it contains false positives, because it's
reporting valid problems but not valid within the context of a
programming language (ambiguous charachters in code comments being a
prime example) that can lead to security issues (iii) charachters from
certain languages always being marked as ambiguous. It's a lot of effort
to fix the aforementioned issues.
- Therefore, make it configurable in which context the ambiguous
character detection should be run, this avoids running detection in all
contexts such as file views, but still enable it in commits and pull
requests diffs where it matters the most. Ideally this also becomes an
per-repository setting, but the code architecture doesn't allow for a
clean implementation of that.
- Adds unit test.
- Adds integration tests to ensure that the contexts and instance-wide
is respected (and that ambigious charachter detection actually work in
different places).
- Ref: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/2395#issuecomment-1575547
- Ref: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/564
Adds a very bare-bones test for artifact deletion. It does not exercise
the functionality itself, just the presence of the functionality.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
It's possible for reviews to not be assiocated with users, when they
were migrated from another forge instance. In the migration code,
there's no sanitization check for author names, so they could contain
HTML tags and thus needs to be properely escaped.
On the wiki and revisions page, information is shown about the last
commit that modified that wiki page. This includes the time it was last
edited and by whom. Verify it is sanitized.
