This PR introduces the `ReviewedOn` and `ReviewedBy` variables for the
default merge message templates (e.g.,
`.gitea/default_merge_message/MERGE_TEMPLATE.md`).
This allows customizing the default merge messages while retaining these
trailers.
This also moves the associated logic out of `pull.tmpl` into the
relevant Go function.
This is a first contribution towards #11077.
---
For illustration, this allows to recreate the "default default" merge
message with the following template:
```
.gitea/default_merge_message/MERGE_TEMPLATE.md
Merge pull request '${PullRequestTitle}' (${PullRequestReference}) from ${HeadBranch} into ${BaseBranch}
${ReviewedOn}
${ReviewedBy}
```
(cherry picked from commit da4bbc42477ba04d175cc0775a0c5ec90c4c24fe)
Conflicts:
docs/content/usage/merge-message-templates.en-us.md
not in Forgejo
templates/repo/issue/view_content/pull.tmpl
trivial context conflict
fixes#22907
Tested:
- [x] issue content edit
- [x] issue content change tasklist
- [x] pull request content edit
- [x] pull request change tasklist
(cherry picked from commit aa92b13164e84c26be91153b6022220ce0a27720)
Conflicts:
models/issues/comment.go
c7a389f2b2 [FEAT] allow setting the update date on issues and comments
options/locale/locale_en-US.ini
trivial context conflicts
routers/api/v1/repo/issue_comment.go
routers/api/v1/repo/issue_comment_attachment.go
services/issue/comments.go
services/issue/content.go
user blocking is implemented differently in Forgejo
routers/web/repo/issue.go
trivial difference from 6a0750177f Allow to save empty comment
user blocking is implemented differently in Forgejo
templates/repo/issue/view_content/conversation.tmpl
templates changed a lot in Forgejo but the change is
trivially ported
tests/integration/issue_test.go
other tests were added in the same region
web_src/js/features/repo-issue-edit.js
the code is still web_src/js/features/repo-legacy.js
trivially ported
This PR split the `Board` into two parts. One is the struct has been
renamed to `Column` and the second we have a `Template Type`.
But to make it easier to review, this PR will not change the database
schemas, they are just renames. The database schema changes could be in
future PRs.
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: yp05327 <576951401@qq.com>
(cherry picked from commit 98751108b11dc748cc99230ca0fc1acfdf2c8929)
Conflicts:
docs/content/administration/config-cheat-sheet.en-us.md
docs/content/index.en-us.md
docs/content/installation/comparison.en-us.md
docs/content/usage/permissions.en-us.md
non existent files
options/locale/locale_en-US.ini
routers/web/web.go
templates/repo/header.tmpl
templates/repo/settings/options.tmpl
trivial context conflicts
This PR ports [gitea#30858](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/30858) / [this commit](5c236bd4c0) to forgejo.
[week 2024-20 cherry pick](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/3729)
## Tests
- [ ] Click "edit" to get into edit mode, change the title and then use Alt+Enter to save the title
## Screenshots
Before:
After:
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/3797
Reviewed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Mai-Lapyst <mai-lapyst@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: Mai-Lapyst <mai-lapyst@noreply.codeberg.org>
More about codespell: https://github.com/codespell-project/codespell .
I personally introduced it to dozens if not hundreds of projects already and so far only positive feedback.
```
❯ grep lint-spell Makefile
@echo " - lint-spell lint spelling"
@echo " - lint-spell-fix lint spelling and fix issues"
lint: lint-frontend lint-backend lint-spell
lint-fix: lint-frontend-fix lint-backend-fix lint-spell-fix
.PHONY: lint-spell
lint-spell: lint-codespell
.PHONY: lint-spell-fix
lint-spell-fix: lint-codespell-fix
❯ git grep lint- -- .forgejo/
.forgejo/workflows/testing.yml: - run: make --always-make -j$(nproc) lint-backend checks-backend # ensure the "go-licenses" make target runs
.forgejo/workflows/testing.yml: - run: make lint-frontend
```
so how would you like me to invoke `lint-codespell` on CI? (without that would be IMHO very suboptimal and let typos sneak in)
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/3270
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Yaroslav Halchenko <debian@onerussian.com>
Co-committed-by: Yaroslav Halchenko <debian@onerussian.com>
The WIP prefix toggling link on the sidebar only supported toggling
the *first* prefix specified in
`[repository.pullrequest].WORK_IN_PROGRESS_PREFIXES`. If the pull
request had a title with any other prefix, the first prefix listed in
the config was added (and then removed on toggling it off).
This little change makes all of the prefixes available for the
JavaScript function that does the toggling, and changes said function to
find the used prefix first, and toggle that.
When adding the prefix, it will still default to adding the first one
listed in the configuration, but it will happily remove any others if
those are present.
Fixes#3377.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
- fix rounding on /notifications/subscriptions
- add navigation interconnectivity between notifications and subscriptions
- use modern style for tabs
- clearing notificatons: hide the whole form instead of div. It doesn't seem like its changed via JS?
- replace issue-title-buttons and edit-buttons with universal top-right-buttons, get rid of tw-mr-0 helpers
- repo issues: fix misalignments on mobile view
Create a new `issue-navbar` class specifically for this bar, previous
class used in many places and I thought I had them all removed, but not
this one.
Fixes: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/30226
(cherry picked from commit 944c76e78423405a33450eb3d07cd2b772f4a81c)
Another pure CSS module. Some styling is part of the `form` module which
will likely follow next.
(cherry picked from commit ff334749f58c71980ec19143bc21c0a799074b30)
Conflicts:
- web_src/js/components/DashboardRepoList.vue
Resolved the conflict by manually applying the Gitea change.
On the labels list, This `left` class caused the dropdown content to
flash on page load until JS had hidden it. Remove it as I see no purpose
to it.
<img width="215" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/115237/9e1de97f-dd89-41e0-9229-5c4a786ba762">
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 8da9130c1ffe93e0e97290fddb908ae5b67432e2)
Get rid of one more jQuery dependant and have a nicer color picker as
well.
Now there is only a single global color picker init because that is all
that's necessary because the elements are present on the page when the
init code runs. The init is slightly weird because the module only takes
a selector instead of DOM elements directly.
The label modals now also perform form validation because previously it
was possible to trigger a 500 error `Color cannot be empty.` by clearing
out the color value on labels.
<img width="867" alt="Screenshot 2024-03-25 at 00 21 05"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/115237/71215c39-abb1-4881-b5c1-9954b4a89adb">
<img width="860" alt="Screenshot 2024-03-25 at 00 20 48"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/115237/a12cb68f-c38b-4433-ba05-53bbb4b1023e">
(cherry picked from commit dd8dde2be89921b2b1497c6cc5eafdde213429cb)
