forgejo/tests/integration/gpg_git_test.go

307 lines
14 KiB
Go
Raw Normal View History

Sign merges, CRUD, Wiki and Repository initialisation with gpg key (#7631) This PR fixes #7598 by providing a configurable way of signing commits across the Gitea instance. Per repository configurability and import/generation of trusted secure keys is not provided by this PR - from a security PoV that's probably impossible to do properly. Similarly web-signing, that is asking the user to sign something, is not implemented - this could be done at a later stage however. ## Features - [x] If commit.gpgsign is set in .gitconfig sign commits and files created through repofiles. (merges should already have been signed.) - [x] Verify commits signed with the default gpg as valid - [x] Signer, Committer and Author can all be different - [x] Allow signer to be arbitrarily different - We still require the key to have an activated email on Gitea. A more complete implementation would be to use a keyserver and mark external-or-unactivated with an "unknown" trust level icon. - [x] Add a signing-key.gpg endpoint to get the default gpg pub key if available - Rather than add a fake web-flow user I've added this as an endpoint on /api/v1/signing-key.gpg - [x] Try to match the default key with a user on gitea - this is done at verification time - [x] Make things configurable? - app.ini configuration done - [x] when checking commits are signed need to check if they're actually verifiable too - [x] Add documentation I have decided that adjusting the docker to create a default gpg key is not the correct thing to do and therefore have not implemented this.
2019-10-16 15:42:42 +02:00
// Copyright 2019 The Gitea Authors. All rights reserved.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
Sign merges, CRUD, Wiki and Repository initialisation with gpg key (#7631) This PR fixes #7598 by providing a configurable way of signing commits across the Gitea instance. Per repository configurability and import/generation of trusted secure keys is not provided by this PR - from a security PoV that's probably impossible to do properly. Similarly web-signing, that is asking the user to sign something, is not implemented - this could be done at a later stage however. ## Features - [x] If commit.gpgsign is set in .gitconfig sign commits and files created through repofiles. (merges should already have been signed.) - [x] Verify commits signed with the default gpg as valid - [x] Signer, Committer and Author can all be different - [x] Allow signer to be arbitrarily different - We still require the key to have an activated email on Gitea. A more complete implementation would be to use a keyserver and mark external-or-unactivated with an "unknown" trust level icon. - [x] Add a signing-key.gpg endpoint to get the default gpg pub key if available - Rather than add a fake web-flow user I've added this as an endpoint on /api/v1/signing-key.gpg - [x] Try to match the default key with a user on gitea - this is done at verification time - [x] Make things configurable? - app.ini configuration done - [x] when checking commits are signed need to check if they're actually verifiable too - [x] Add documentation I have decided that adjusting the docker to create a default gpg key is not the correct thing to do and therefore have not implemented this.
2019-10-16 15:42:42 +02:00
package integration
Sign merges, CRUD, Wiki and Repository initialisation with gpg key (#7631) This PR fixes #7598 by providing a configurable way of signing commits across the Gitea instance. Per repository configurability and import/generation of trusted secure keys is not provided by this PR - from a security PoV that's probably impossible to do properly. Similarly web-signing, that is asking the user to sign something, is not implemented - this could be done at a later stage however. ## Features - [x] If commit.gpgsign is set in .gitconfig sign commits and files created through repofiles. (merges should already have been signed.) - [x] Verify commits signed with the default gpg as valid - [x] Signer, Committer and Author can all be different - [x] Allow signer to be arbitrarily different - We still require the key to have an activated email on Gitea. A more complete implementation would be to use a keyserver and mark external-or-unactivated with an "unknown" trust level icon. - [x] Add a signing-key.gpg endpoint to get the default gpg pub key if available - Rather than add a fake web-flow user I've added this as an endpoint on /api/v1/signing-key.gpg - [x] Try to match the default key with a user on gitea - this is done at verification time - [x] Make things configurable? - app.ini configuration done - [x] when checking commits are signed need to check if they're actually verifiable too - [x] Add documentation I have decided that adjusting the docker to create a default gpg key is not the correct thing to do and therefore have not implemented this.
2019-10-16 15:42:42 +02:00
import (
"encoding/base64"
"fmt"
"net/url"
"os"
"testing"
auth_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/auth"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/models/unittest"
user_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/user"
Sign merges, CRUD, Wiki and Repository initialisation with gpg key (#7631) This PR fixes #7598 by providing a configurable way of signing commits across the Gitea instance. Per repository configurability and import/generation of trusted secure keys is not provided by this PR - from a security PoV that's probably impossible to do properly. Similarly web-signing, that is asking the user to sign something, is not implemented - this could be done at a later stage however. ## Features - [x] If commit.gpgsign is set in .gitconfig sign commits and files created through repofiles. (merges should already have been signed.) - [x] Verify commits signed with the default gpg as valid - [x] Signer, Committer and Author can all be different - [x] Allow signer to be arbitrarily different - We still require the key to have an activated email on Gitea. A more complete implementation would be to use a keyserver and mark external-or-unactivated with an "unknown" trust level icon. - [x] Add a signing-key.gpg endpoint to get the default gpg pub key if available - Rather than add a fake web-flow user I've added this as an endpoint on /api/v1/signing-key.gpg - [x] Try to match the default key with a user on gitea - this is done at verification time - [x] Make things configurable? - app.ini configuration done - [x] when checking commits are signed need to check if they're actually verifiable too - [x] Add documentation I have decided that adjusting the docker to create a default gpg key is not the correct thing to do and therefore have not implemented this.
2019-10-16 15:42:42 +02:00
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/process"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/setting"
api "code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/structs"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/test"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/tests"
Sign merges, CRUD, Wiki and Repository initialisation with gpg key (#7631) This PR fixes #7598 by providing a configurable way of signing commits across the Gitea instance. Per repository configurability and import/generation of trusted secure keys is not provided by this PR - from a security PoV that's probably impossible to do properly. Similarly web-signing, that is asking the user to sign something, is not implemented - this could be done at a later stage however. ## Features - [x] If commit.gpgsign is set in .gitconfig sign commits and files created through repofiles. (merges should already have been signed.) - [x] Verify commits signed with the default gpg as valid - [x] Signer, Committer and Author can all be different - [x] Allow signer to be arbitrarily different - We still require the key to have an activated email on Gitea. A more complete implementation would be to use a keyserver and mark external-or-unactivated with an "unknown" trust level icon. - [x] Add a signing-key.gpg endpoint to get the default gpg pub key if available - Rather than add a fake web-flow user I've added this as an endpoint on /api/v1/signing-key.gpg - [x] Try to match the default key with a user on gitea - this is done at verification time - [x] Make things configurable? - app.ini configuration done - [x] when checking commits are signed need to check if they're actually verifiable too - [x] Add documentation I have decided that adjusting the docker to create a default gpg key is not the correct thing to do and therefore have not implemented this.
2019-10-16 15:42:42 +02:00
"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
"golang.org/x/crypto/openpgp"
"golang.org/x/crypto/openpgp/armor"
)
func TestGPGGit(t *testing.T) {
tmpDir := t.TempDir() // use a temp dir to avoid messing with the user's GPG keyring
err := os.Chmod(tmpDir, 0o700)
Sign merges, CRUD, Wiki and Repository initialisation with gpg key (#7631) This PR fixes #7598 by providing a configurable way of signing commits across the Gitea instance. Per repository configurability and import/generation of trusted secure keys is not provided by this PR - from a security PoV that's probably impossible to do properly. Similarly web-signing, that is asking the user to sign something, is not implemented - this could be done at a later stage however. ## Features - [x] If commit.gpgsign is set in .gitconfig sign commits and files created through repofiles. (merges should already have been signed.) - [x] Verify commits signed with the default gpg as valid - [x] Signer, Committer and Author can all be different - [x] Allow signer to be arbitrarily different - We still require the key to have an activated email on Gitea. A more complete implementation would be to use a keyserver and mark external-or-unactivated with an "unknown" trust level icon. - [x] Add a signing-key.gpg endpoint to get the default gpg pub key if available - Rather than add a fake web-flow user I've added this as an endpoint on /api/v1/signing-key.gpg - [x] Try to match the default key with a user on gitea - this is done at verification time - [x] Make things configurable? - app.ini configuration done - [x] when checking commits are signed need to check if they're actually verifiable too - [x] Add documentation I have decided that adjusting the docker to create a default gpg key is not the correct thing to do and therefore have not implemented this.
2019-10-16 15:42:42 +02:00
assert.NoError(t, err)
oldGNUPGHome := os.Getenv("GNUPGHOME")
err = os.Setenv("GNUPGHOME", tmpDir)
assert.NoError(t, err)
defer os.Setenv("GNUPGHOME", oldGNUPGHome)
// Need to create a root key
rootKeyPair, err := importTestingKey(tmpDir, "gitea", "gitea@fake.local")
if !assert.NoError(t, err, "importTestingKey") {
return
}
Sign merges, CRUD, Wiki and Repository initialisation with gpg key (#7631) This PR fixes #7598 by providing a configurable way of signing commits across the Gitea instance. Per repository configurability and import/generation of trusted secure keys is not provided by this PR - from a security PoV that's probably impossible to do properly. Similarly web-signing, that is asking the user to sign something, is not implemented - this could be done at a later stage however. ## Features - [x] If commit.gpgsign is set in .gitconfig sign commits and files created through repofiles. (merges should already have been signed.) - [x] Verify commits signed with the default gpg as valid - [x] Signer, Committer and Author can all be different - [x] Allow signer to be arbitrarily different - We still require the key to have an activated email on Gitea. A more complete implementation would be to use a keyserver and mark external-or-unactivated with an "unknown" trust level icon. - [x] Add a signing-key.gpg endpoint to get the default gpg pub key if available - Rather than add a fake web-flow user I've added this as an endpoint on /api/v1/signing-key.gpg - [x] Try to match the default key with a user on gitea - this is done at verification time - [x] Make things configurable? - app.ini configuration done - [x] when checking commits are signed need to check if they're actually verifiable too - [x] Add documentation I have decided that adjusting the docker to create a default gpg key is not the correct thing to do and therefore have not implemented this.
2019-10-16 15:42:42 +02:00
defer test.MockVariableValue(&setting.Repository.Signing.SigningKey, rootKeyPair.PrimaryKey.KeyIdShortString())()
defer test.MockVariableValue(&setting.Repository.Signing.SigningName, "gitea")()
defer test.MockVariableValue(&setting.Repository.Signing.SigningEmail, "gitea@fake.local")()
defer test.MockVariableValue(&setting.Repository.Signing.InitialCommit, []string{"never"})()
defer test.MockVariableValue(&setting.Repository.Signing.CRUDActions, []string{"never"})()
Sign merges, CRUD, Wiki and Repository initialisation with gpg key (#7631) This PR fixes #7598 by providing a configurable way of signing commits across the Gitea instance. Per repository configurability and import/generation of trusted secure keys is not provided by this PR - from a security PoV that's probably impossible to do properly. Similarly web-signing, that is asking the user to sign something, is not implemented - this could be done at a later stage however. ## Features - [x] If commit.gpgsign is set in .gitconfig sign commits and files created through repofiles. (merges should already have been signed.) - [x] Verify commits signed with the default gpg as valid - [x] Signer, Committer and Author can all be different - [x] Allow signer to be arbitrarily different - We still require the key to have an activated email on Gitea. A more complete implementation would be to use a keyserver and mark external-or-unactivated with an "unknown" trust level icon. - [x] Add a signing-key.gpg endpoint to get the default gpg pub key if available - Rather than add a fake web-flow user I've added this as an endpoint on /api/v1/signing-key.gpg - [x] Try to match the default key with a user on gitea - this is done at verification time - [x] Make things configurable? - app.ini configuration done - [x] when checking commits are signed need to check if they're actually verifiable too - [x] Add documentation I have decided that adjusting the docker to create a default gpg key is not the correct thing to do and therefore have not implemented this.
2019-10-16 15:42:42 +02:00
username := "user2"
user := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{Name: username})
baseAPITestContext := NewAPITestContext(t, username, "repo1")
onGiteaRun(t, func(t *testing.T, u *url.URL) {
u.Path = baseAPITestContext.GitPath()
t.Run("Unsigned-Initial", func(t *testing.T) {
defer tests.PrintCurrentTest(t)()
Redesign Scoped Access Tokens (#24767) ## Changes - Adds the following high level access scopes, each with `read` and `write` levels: - `activitypub` - `admin` (hidden if user is not a site admin) - `misc` - `notification` - `organization` - `package` - `issue` - `repository` - `user` - Adds new middleware function `tokenRequiresScopes()` in addition to `reqToken()` - `tokenRequiresScopes()` is used for each high-level api section - _if_ a scoped token is present, checks that the required scope is included based on the section and HTTP method - `reqToken()` is used for individual routes - checks that required authentication is present (but does not check scope levels as this will already have been handled by `tokenRequiresScopes()` - Adds migration to convert old scoped access tokens to the new set of scopes - Updates the user interface for scope selection ### User interface example <img width="903" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 55 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/654766ec-2143-4f59-9037-3b51600e32f3"> <img width="917" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 43 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/1ad64081-012c-4a73-b393-66b30352654c"> ## tokenRequiresScopes Design Decision - `tokenRequiresScopes()` was added to more reliably cover api routes. For an incoming request, this function uses the given scope category (say `AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization`) and the HTTP method (say `DELETE`) and verifies that any scoped tokens in use include `delete:organization`. - `reqToken()` is used to enforce auth for individual routes that require it. If a scoped token is not present for a request, `tokenRequiresScopes()` will not return an error ## TODO - [x] Alphabetize scope categories - [x] Change 'public repos only' to a radio button (private vs public). Also expand this to organizations - [X] Disable token creation if no scopes selected. Alternatively, show warning - [x] `reqToken()` is missing from many `POST/DELETE` routes in the api. `tokenRequiresScopes()` only checks that a given token has the correct scope, `reqToken()` must be used to check that a token (or some other auth) is present. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] The migration should be reviewed very carefully in order to minimize access changes to existing user tokens. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] Link to api to swagger documentation, clarify what read/write/delete levels correspond to - [x] Review cases where more than one scope is needed as this directly deviates from the api definition. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - For example: ```go m.Group("/users/{username}/orgs", func() { m.Get("", reqToken(), org.ListUserOrgs) m.Get("/{org}/permissions", reqToken(), org.GetUserOrgsPermissions) }, tokenRequiresScopes(auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryUser, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization), context_service.UserAssignmentAPI()) ``` ## Future improvements - [ ] Add required scopes to swagger documentation - [ ] Redesign `reqToken()` to be opt-out rather than opt-in - [ ] Subdivide scopes like `repository` - [ ] Once a token is created, if it has no scopes, we should display text instead of an empty bullet point - [ ] If the 'public repos only' option is selected, should read categories be selected by default Closes #24501 Closes #24799 Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jon@allspice.io> Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-04 20:57:16 +02:00
testCtx := NewAPITestContext(t, username, "initial-unsigned", auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteRepository, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteUser)
t.Run("CreateRepository", doAPICreateRepository(testCtx, false))
t.Run("CheckMasterBranchUnsigned", doAPIGetBranch(testCtx, "master", func(t *testing.T, branch api.Branch) {
assert.NotNil(t, branch.Commit)
assert.NotNil(t, branch.Commit.Verification)
assert.False(t, branch.Commit.Verification.Verified)
assert.Empty(t, branch.Commit.Verification.Signature)
Sign merges, CRUD, Wiki and Repository initialisation with gpg key (#7631) This PR fixes #7598 by providing a configurable way of signing commits across the Gitea instance. Per repository configurability and import/generation of trusted secure keys is not provided by this PR - from a security PoV that's probably impossible to do properly. Similarly web-signing, that is asking the user to sign something, is not implemented - this could be done at a later stage however. ## Features - [x] If commit.gpgsign is set in .gitconfig sign commits and files created through repofiles. (merges should already have been signed.) - [x] Verify commits signed with the default gpg as valid - [x] Signer, Committer and Author can all be different - [x] Allow signer to be arbitrarily different - We still require the key to have an activated email on Gitea. A more complete implementation would be to use a keyserver and mark external-or-unactivated with an "unknown" trust level icon. - [x] Add a signing-key.gpg endpoint to get the default gpg pub key if available - Rather than add a fake web-flow user I've added this as an endpoint on /api/v1/signing-key.gpg - [x] Try to match the default key with a user on gitea - this is done at verification time - [x] Make things configurable? - app.ini configuration done - [x] when checking commits are signed need to check if they're actually verifiable too - [x] Add documentation I have decided that adjusting the docker to create a default gpg key is not the correct thing to do and therefore have not implemented this.
2019-10-16 15:42:42 +02:00
}))
t.Run("CreateCRUDFile-Never", crudActionCreateFile(
t, testCtx, user, "master", "never", "unsigned-never.txt", func(t *testing.T, response api.FileResponse) {
assert.False(t, response.Verification.Verified)
}))
t.Run("CreateCRUDFile-Never", crudActionCreateFile(
t, testCtx, user, "never", "never2", "unsigned-never2.txt", func(t *testing.T, response api.FileResponse) {
assert.False(t, response.Verification.Verified)
}))
})
setting.Repository.Signing.CRUDActions = []string{"parentsigned"}
t.Run("Unsigned-Initial-CRUD-ParentSigned", func(t *testing.T) {
defer tests.PrintCurrentTest(t)()
Redesign Scoped Access Tokens (#24767) ## Changes - Adds the following high level access scopes, each with `read` and `write` levels: - `activitypub` - `admin` (hidden if user is not a site admin) - `misc` - `notification` - `organization` - `package` - `issue` - `repository` - `user` - Adds new middleware function `tokenRequiresScopes()` in addition to `reqToken()` - `tokenRequiresScopes()` is used for each high-level api section - _if_ a scoped token is present, checks that the required scope is included based on the section and HTTP method - `reqToken()` is used for individual routes - checks that required authentication is present (but does not check scope levels as this will already have been handled by `tokenRequiresScopes()` - Adds migration to convert old scoped access tokens to the new set of scopes - Updates the user interface for scope selection ### User interface example <img width="903" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 55 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/654766ec-2143-4f59-9037-3b51600e32f3"> <img width="917" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 43 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/1ad64081-012c-4a73-b393-66b30352654c"> ## tokenRequiresScopes Design Decision - `tokenRequiresScopes()` was added to more reliably cover api routes. For an incoming request, this function uses the given scope category (say `AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization`) and the HTTP method (say `DELETE`) and verifies that any scoped tokens in use include `delete:organization`. - `reqToken()` is used to enforce auth for individual routes that require it. If a scoped token is not present for a request, `tokenRequiresScopes()` will not return an error ## TODO - [x] Alphabetize scope categories - [x] Change 'public repos only' to a radio button (private vs public). Also expand this to organizations - [X] Disable token creation if no scopes selected. Alternatively, show warning - [x] `reqToken()` is missing from many `POST/DELETE` routes in the api. `tokenRequiresScopes()` only checks that a given token has the correct scope, `reqToken()` must be used to check that a token (or some other auth) is present. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] The migration should be reviewed very carefully in order to minimize access changes to existing user tokens. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] Link to api to swagger documentation, clarify what read/write/delete levels correspond to - [x] Review cases where more than one scope is needed as this directly deviates from the api definition. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - For example: ```go m.Group("/users/{username}/orgs", func() { m.Get("", reqToken(), org.ListUserOrgs) m.Get("/{org}/permissions", reqToken(), org.GetUserOrgsPermissions) }, tokenRequiresScopes(auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryUser, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization), context_service.UserAssignmentAPI()) ``` ## Future improvements - [ ] Add required scopes to swagger documentation - [ ] Redesign `reqToken()` to be opt-out rather than opt-in - [ ] Subdivide scopes like `repository` - [ ] Once a token is created, if it has no scopes, we should display text instead of an empty bullet point - [ ] If the 'public repos only' option is selected, should read categories be selected by default Closes #24501 Closes #24799 Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jon@allspice.io> Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-04 20:57:16 +02:00
testCtx := NewAPITestContext(t, username, "initial-unsigned", auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteRepository, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteUser)
t.Run("CreateCRUDFile-ParentSigned", crudActionCreateFile(
t, testCtx, user, "master", "parentsigned", "signed-parent.txt", func(t *testing.T, response api.FileResponse) {
assert.False(t, response.Verification.Verified)
}))
t.Run("CreateCRUDFile-ParentSigned", crudActionCreateFile(
t, testCtx, user, "parentsigned", "parentsigned2", "signed-parent2.txt", func(t *testing.T, response api.FileResponse) {
assert.False(t, response.Verification.Verified)
}))
})
setting.Repository.Signing.CRUDActions = []string{"never"}
t.Run("Unsigned-Initial-CRUD-Never", func(t *testing.T) {
defer tests.PrintCurrentTest(t)()
Redesign Scoped Access Tokens (#24767) ## Changes - Adds the following high level access scopes, each with `read` and `write` levels: - `activitypub` - `admin` (hidden if user is not a site admin) - `misc` - `notification` - `organization` - `package` - `issue` - `repository` - `user` - Adds new middleware function `tokenRequiresScopes()` in addition to `reqToken()` - `tokenRequiresScopes()` is used for each high-level api section - _if_ a scoped token is present, checks that the required scope is included based on the section and HTTP method - `reqToken()` is used for individual routes - checks that required authentication is present (but does not check scope levels as this will already have been handled by `tokenRequiresScopes()` - Adds migration to convert old scoped access tokens to the new set of scopes - Updates the user interface for scope selection ### User interface example <img width="903" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 55 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/654766ec-2143-4f59-9037-3b51600e32f3"> <img width="917" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 43 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/1ad64081-012c-4a73-b393-66b30352654c"> ## tokenRequiresScopes Design Decision - `tokenRequiresScopes()` was added to more reliably cover api routes. For an incoming request, this function uses the given scope category (say `AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization`) and the HTTP method (say `DELETE`) and verifies that any scoped tokens in use include `delete:organization`. - `reqToken()` is used to enforce auth for individual routes that require it. If a scoped token is not present for a request, `tokenRequiresScopes()` will not return an error ## TODO - [x] Alphabetize scope categories - [x] Change 'public repos only' to a radio button (private vs public). Also expand this to organizations - [X] Disable token creation if no scopes selected. Alternatively, show warning - [x] `reqToken()` is missing from many `POST/DELETE` routes in the api. `tokenRequiresScopes()` only checks that a given token has the correct scope, `reqToken()` must be used to check that a token (or some other auth) is present. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] The migration should be reviewed very carefully in order to minimize access changes to existing user tokens. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] Link to api to swagger documentation, clarify what read/write/delete levels correspond to - [x] Review cases where more than one scope is needed as this directly deviates from the api definition. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - For example: ```go m.Group("/users/{username}/orgs", func() { m.Get("", reqToken(), org.ListUserOrgs) m.Get("/{org}/permissions", reqToken(), org.GetUserOrgsPermissions) }, tokenRequiresScopes(auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryUser, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization), context_service.UserAssignmentAPI()) ``` ## Future improvements - [ ] Add required scopes to swagger documentation - [ ] Redesign `reqToken()` to be opt-out rather than opt-in - [ ] Subdivide scopes like `repository` - [ ] Once a token is created, if it has no scopes, we should display text instead of an empty bullet point - [ ] If the 'public repos only' option is selected, should read categories be selected by default Closes #24501 Closes #24799 Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jon@allspice.io> Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-04 20:57:16 +02:00
testCtx := NewAPITestContext(t, username, "initial-unsigned", auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteRepository, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteUser)
t.Run("CreateCRUDFile-Never", crudActionCreateFile(
t, testCtx, user, "parentsigned", "parentsigned-never", "unsigned-never2.txt", func(t *testing.T, response api.FileResponse) {
assert.False(t, response.Verification.Verified)
}))
})
setting.Repository.Signing.CRUDActions = []string{"always"}
t.Run("Unsigned-Initial-CRUD-Always", func(t *testing.T) {
defer tests.PrintCurrentTest(t)()
Redesign Scoped Access Tokens (#24767) ## Changes - Adds the following high level access scopes, each with `read` and `write` levels: - `activitypub` - `admin` (hidden if user is not a site admin) - `misc` - `notification` - `organization` - `package` - `issue` - `repository` - `user` - Adds new middleware function `tokenRequiresScopes()` in addition to `reqToken()` - `tokenRequiresScopes()` is used for each high-level api section - _if_ a scoped token is present, checks that the required scope is included based on the section and HTTP method - `reqToken()` is used for individual routes - checks that required authentication is present (but does not check scope levels as this will already have been handled by `tokenRequiresScopes()` - Adds migration to convert old scoped access tokens to the new set of scopes - Updates the user interface for scope selection ### User interface example <img width="903" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 55 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/654766ec-2143-4f59-9037-3b51600e32f3"> <img width="917" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 43 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/1ad64081-012c-4a73-b393-66b30352654c"> ## tokenRequiresScopes Design Decision - `tokenRequiresScopes()` was added to more reliably cover api routes. For an incoming request, this function uses the given scope category (say `AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization`) and the HTTP method (say `DELETE`) and verifies that any scoped tokens in use include `delete:organization`. - `reqToken()` is used to enforce auth for individual routes that require it. If a scoped token is not present for a request, `tokenRequiresScopes()` will not return an error ## TODO - [x] Alphabetize scope categories - [x] Change 'public repos only' to a radio button (private vs public). Also expand this to organizations - [X] Disable token creation if no scopes selected. Alternatively, show warning - [x] `reqToken()` is missing from many `POST/DELETE` routes in the api. `tokenRequiresScopes()` only checks that a given token has the correct scope, `reqToken()` must be used to check that a token (or some other auth) is present. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] The migration should be reviewed very carefully in order to minimize access changes to existing user tokens. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] Link to api to swagger documentation, clarify what read/write/delete levels correspond to - [x] Review cases where more than one scope is needed as this directly deviates from the api definition. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - For example: ```go m.Group("/users/{username}/orgs", func() { m.Get("", reqToken(), org.ListUserOrgs) m.Get("/{org}/permissions", reqToken(), org.GetUserOrgsPermissions) }, tokenRequiresScopes(auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryUser, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization), context_service.UserAssignmentAPI()) ``` ## Future improvements - [ ] Add required scopes to swagger documentation - [ ] Redesign `reqToken()` to be opt-out rather than opt-in - [ ] Subdivide scopes like `repository` - [ ] Once a token is created, if it has no scopes, we should display text instead of an empty bullet point - [ ] If the 'public repos only' option is selected, should read categories be selected by default Closes #24501 Closes #24799 Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jon@allspice.io> Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-04 20:57:16 +02:00
testCtx := NewAPITestContext(t, username, "initial-unsigned", auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteRepository, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteUser)
t.Run("CreateCRUDFile-Always", crudActionCreateFile(
t, testCtx, user, "master", "always", "signed-always.txt", func(t *testing.T, response api.FileResponse) {
assert.NotNil(t, response.Verification)
if response.Verification == nil {
assert.FailNow(t, "no verification provided with response! %v", response)
}
assert.True(t, response.Verification.Verified)
if !response.Verification.Verified {
t.FailNow()
}
assert.Equal(t, "gitea@fake.local", response.Verification.Signer.Email)
}))
t.Run("CreateCRUDFile-ParentSigned-always", crudActionCreateFile(
t, testCtx, user, "parentsigned", "parentsigned-always", "signed-parent2.txt", func(t *testing.T, response api.FileResponse) {
assert.NotNil(t, response.Verification)
if response.Verification == nil {
assert.FailNow(t, "no verification provided with response! %v", response)
}
assert.True(t, response.Verification.Verified)
if !response.Verification.Verified {
t.FailNow()
}
assert.Equal(t, "gitea@fake.local", response.Verification.Signer.Email)
}))
})
setting.Repository.Signing.CRUDActions = []string{"parentsigned"}
t.Run("Unsigned-Initial-CRUD-ParentSigned", func(t *testing.T) {
defer tests.PrintCurrentTest(t)()
Redesign Scoped Access Tokens (#24767) ## Changes - Adds the following high level access scopes, each with `read` and `write` levels: - `activitypub` - `admin` (hidden if user is not a site admin) - `misc` - `notification` - `organization` - `package` - `issue` - `repository` - `user` - Adds new middleware function `tokenRequiresScopes()` in addition to `reqToken()` - `tokenRequiresScopes()` is used for each high-level api section - _if_ a scoped token is present, checks that the required scope is included based on the section and HTTP method - `reqToken()` is used for individual routes - checks that required authentication is present (but does not check scope levels as this will already have been handled by `tokenRequiresScopes()` - Adds migration to convert old scoped access tokens to the new set of scopes - Updates the user interface for scope selection ### User interface example <img width="903" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 55 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/654766ec-2143-4f59-9037-3b51600e32f3"> <img width="917" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 43 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/1ad64081-012c-4a73-b393-66b30352654c"> ## tokenRequiresScopes Design Decision - `tokenRequiresScopes()` was added to more reliably cover api routes. For an incoming request, this function uses the given scope category (say `AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization`) and the HTTP method (say `DELETE`) and verifies that any scoped tokens in use include `delete:organization`. - `reqToken()` is used to enforce auth for individual routes that require it. If a scoped token is not present for a request, `tokenRequiresScopes()` will not return an error ## TODO - [x] Alphabetize scope categories - [x] Change 'public repos only' to a radio button (private vs public). Also expand this to organizations - [X] Disable token creation if no scopes selected. Alternatively, show warning - [x] `reqToken()` is missing from many `POST/DELETE` routes in the api. `tokenRequiresScopes()` only checks that a given token has the correct scope, `reqToken()` must be used to check that a token (or some other auth) is present. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] The migration should be reviewed very carefully in order to minimize access changes to existing user tokens. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] Link to api to swagger documentation, clarify what read/write/delete levels correspond to - [x] Review cases where more than one scope is needed as this directly deviates from the api definition. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - For example: ```go m.Group("/users/{username}/orgs", func() { m.Get("", reqToken(), org.ListUserOrgs) m.Get("/{org}/permissions", reqToken(), org.GetUserOrgsPermissions) }, tokenRequiresScopes(auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryUser, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization), context_service.UserAssignmentAPI()) ``` ## Future improvements - [ ] Add required scopes to swagger documentation - [ ] Redesign `reqToken()` to be opt-out rather than opt-in - [ ] Subdivide scopes like `repository` - [ ] Once a token is created, if it has no scopes, we should display text instead of an empty bullet point - [ ] If the 'public repos only' option is selected, should read categories be selected by default Closes #24501 Closes #24799 Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jon@allspice.io> Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-04 20:57:16 +02:00
testCtx := NewAPITestContext(t, username, "initial-unsigned", auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteRepository, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteUser)
t.Run("CreateCRUDFile-Always-ParentSigned", crudActionCreateFile(
t, testCtx, user, "always", "always-parentsigned", "signed-always-parentsigned.txt", func(t *testing.T, response api.FileResponse) {
assert.NotNil(t, response.Verification)
if response.Verification == nil {
assert.FailNow(t, "no verification provided with response! %v", response)
}
assert.True(t, response.Verification.Verified)
if !response.Verification.Verified {
t.FailNow()
}
assert.Equal(t, "gitea@fake.local", response.Verification.Signer.Email)
}))
})
setting.Repository.Signing.InitialCommit = []string{"always"}
t.Run("AlwaysSign-Initial", func(t *testing.T) {
defer tests.PrintCurrentTest(t)()
Redesign Scoped Access Tokens (#24767) ## Changes - Adds the following high level access scopes, each with `read` and `write` levels: - `activitypub` - `admin` (hidden if user is not a site admin) - `misc` - `notification` - `organization` - `package` - `issue` - `repository` - `user` - Adds new middleware function `tokenRequiresScopes()` in addition to `reqToken()` - `tokenRequiresScopes()` is used for each high-level api section - _if_ a scoped token is present, checks that the required scope is included based on the section and HTTP method - `reqToken()` is used for individual routes - checks that required authentication is present (but does not check scope levels as this will already have been handled by `tokenRequiresScopes()` - Adds migration to convert old scoped access tokens to the new set of scopes - Updates the user interface for scope selection ### User interface example <img width="903" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 55 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/654766ec-2143-4f59-9037-3b51600e32f3"> <img width="917" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 43 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/1ad64081-012c-4a73-b393-66b30352654c"> ## tokenRequiresScopes Design Decision - `tokenRequiresScopes()` was added to more reliably cover api routes. For an incoming request, this function uses the given scope category (say `AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization`) and the HTTP method (say `DELETE`) and verifies that any scoped tokens in use include `delete:organization`. - `reqToken()` is used to enforce auth for individual routes that require it. If a scoped token is not present for a request, `tokenRequiresScopes()` will not return an error ## TODO - [x] Alphabetize scope categories - [x] Change 'public repos only' to a radio button (private vs public). Also expand this to organizations - [X] Disable token creation if no scopes selected. Alternatively, show warning - [x] `reqToken()` is missing from many `POST/DELETE` routes in the api. `tokenRequiresScopes()` only checks that a given token has the correct scope, `reqToken()` must be used to check that a token (or some other auth) is present. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] The migration should be reviewed very carefully in order to minimize access changes to existing user tokens. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] Link to api to swagger documentation, clarify what read/write/delete levels correspond to - [x] Review cases where more than one scope is needed as this directly deviates from the api definition. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - For example: ```go m.Group("/users/{username}/orgs", func() { m.Get("", reqToken(), org.ListUserOrgs) m.Get("/{org}/permissions", reqToken(), org.GetUserOrgsPermissions) }, tokenRequiresScopes(auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryUser, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization), context_service.UserAssignmentAPI()) ``` ## Future improvements - [ ] Add required scopes to swagger documentation - [ ] Redesign `reqToken()` to be opt-out rather than opt-in - [ ] Subdivide scopes like `repository` - [ ] Once a token is created, if it has no scopes, we should display text instead of an empty bullet point - [ ] If the 'public repos only' option is selected, should read categories be selected by default Closes #24501 Closes #24799 Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jon@allspice.io> Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-04 20:57:16 +02:00
testCtx := NewAPITestContext(t, username, "initial-always", auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteRepository, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteUser)
t.Run("CreateRepository", doAPICreateRepository(testCtx, false))
t.Run("CheckMasterBranchSigned", doAPIGetBranch(testCtx, "master", func(t *testing.T, branch api.Branch) {
assert.NotNil(t, branch.Commit)
if branch.Commit == nil {
assert.FailNow(t, "no commit provided with branch! %v", branch)
}
assert.NotNil(t, branch.Commit.Verification)
if branch.Commit.Verification == nil {
assert.FailNow(t, "no verification provided with branch commit! %v", branch.Commit)
}
assert.True(t, branch.Commit.Verification.Verified)
if !branch.Commit.Verification.Verified {
t.FailNow()
}
assert.Equal(t, "gitea@fake.local", branch.Commit.Verification.Signer.Email)
Sign merges, CRUD, Wiki and Repository initialisation with gpg key (#7631) This PR fixes #7598 by providing a configurable way of signing commits across the Gitea instance. Per repository configurability and import/generation of trusted secure keys is not provided by this PR - from a security PoV that's probably impossible to do properly. Similarly web-signing, that is asking the user to sign something, is not implemented - this could be done at a later stage however. ## Features - [x] If commit.gpgsign is set in .gitconfig sign commits and files created through repofiles. (merges should already have been signed.) - [x] Verify commits signed with the default gpg as valid - [x] Signer, Committer and Author can all be different - [x] Allow signer to be arbitrarily different - We still require the key to have an activated email on Gitea. A more complete implementation would be to use a keyserver and mark external-or-unactivated with an "unknown" trust level icon. - [x] Add a signing-key.gpg endpoint to get the default gpg pub key if available - Rather than add a fake web-flow user I've added this as an endpoint on /api/v1/signing-key.gpg - [x] Try to match the default key with a user on gitea - this is done at verification time - [x] Make things configurable? - app.ini configuration done - [x] when checking commits are signed need to check if they're actually verifiable too - [x] Add documentation I have decided that adjusting the docker to create a default gpg key is not the correct thing to do and therefore have not implemented this.
2019-10-16 15:42:42 +02:00
}))
})
setting.Repository.Signing.CRUDActions = []string{"never"}
t.Run("AlwaysSign-Initial-CRUD-Never", func(t *testing.T) {
defer tests.PrintCurrentTest(t)()
Redesign Scoped Access Tokens (#24767) ## Changes - Adds the following high level access scopes, each with `read` and `write` levels: - `activitypub` - `admin` (hidden if user is not a site admin) - `misc` - `notification` - `organization` - `package` - `issue` - `repository` - `user` - Adds new middleware function `tokenRequiresScopes()` in addition to `reqToken()` - `tokenRequiresScopes()` is used for each high-level api section - _if_ a scoped token is present, checks that the required scope is included based on the section and HTTP method - `reqToken()` is used for individual routes - checks that required authentication is present (but does not check scope levels as this will already have been handled by `tokenRequiresScopes()` - Adds migration to convert old scoped access tokens to the new set of scopes - Updates the user interface for scope selection ### User interface example <img width="903" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 55 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/654766ec-2143-4f59-9037-3b51600e32f3"> <img width="917" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 43 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/1ad64081-012c-4a73-b393-66b30352654c"> ## tokenRequiresScopes Design Decision - `tokenRequiresScopes()` was added to more reliably cover api routes. For an incoming request, this function uses the given scope category (say `AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization`) and the HTTP method (say `DELETE`) and verifies that any scoped tokens in use include `delete:organization`. - `reqToken()` is used to enforce auth for individual routes that require it. If a scoped token is not present for a request, `tokenRequiresScopes()` will not return an error ## TODO - [x] Alphabetize scope categories - [x] Change 'public repos only' to a radio button (private vs public). Also expand this to organizations - [X] Disable token creation if no scopes selected. Alternatively, show warning - [x] `reqToken()` is missing from many `POST/DELETE` routes in the api. `tokenRequiresScopes()` only checks that a given token has the correct scope, `reqToken()` must be used to check that a token (or some other auth) is present. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] The migration should be reviewed very carefully in order to minimize access changes to existing user tokens. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] Link to api to swagger documentation, clarify what read/write/delete levels correspond to - [x] Review cases where more than one scope is needed as this directly deviates from the api definition. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - For example: ```go m.Group("/users/{username}/orgs", func() { m.Get("", reqToken(), org.ListUserOrgs) m.Get("/{org}/permissions", reqToken(), org.GetUserOrgsPermissions) }, tokenRequiresScopes(auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryUser, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization), context_service.UserAssignmentAPI()) ``` ## Future improvements - [ ] Add required scopes to swagger documentation - [ ] Redesign `reqToken()` to be opt-out rather than opt-in - [ ] Subdivide scopes like `repository` - [ ] Once a token is created, if it has no scopes, we should display text instead of an empty bullet point - [ ] If the 'public repos only' option is selected, should read categories be selected by default Closes #24501 Closes #24799 Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jon@allspice.io> Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-04 20:57:16 +02:00
testCtx := NewAPITestContext(t, username, "initial-always-never", auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteRepository, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteUser)
t.Run("CreateRepository", doAPICreateRepository(testCtx, false))
t.Run("CreateCRUDFile-Never", crudActionCreateFile(
t, testCtx, user, "master", "never", "unsigned-never.txt", func(t *testing.T, response api.FileResponse) {
assert.False(t, response.Verification.Verified)
}))
})
setting.Repository.Signing.CRUDActions = []string{"parentsigned"}
t.Run("AlwaysSign-Initial-CRUD-ParentSigned-On-Always", func(t *testing.T) {
defer tests.PrintCurrentTest(t)()
Redesign Scoped Access Tokens (#24767) ## Changes - Adds the following high level access scopes, each with `read` and `write` levels: - `activitypub` - `admin` (hidden if user is not a site admin) - `misc` - `notification` - `organization` - `package` - `issue` - `repository` - `user` - Adds new middleware function `tokenRequiresScopes()` in addition to `reqToken()` - `tokenRequiresScopes()` is used for each high-level api section - _if_ a scoped token is present, checks that the required scope is included based on the section and HTTP method - `reqToken()` is used for individual routes - checks that required authentication is present (but does not check scope levels as this will already have been handled by `tokenRequiresScopes()` - Adds migration to convert old scoped access tokens to the new set of scopes - Updates the user interface for scope selection ### User interface example <img width="903" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 55 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/654766ec-2143-4f59-9037-3b51600e32f3"> <img width="917" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 43 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/1ad64081-012c-4a73-b393-66b30352654c"> ## tokenRequiresScopes Design Decision - `tokenRequiresScopes()` was added to more reliably cover api routes. For an incoming request, this function uses the given scope category (say `AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization`) and the HTTP method (say `DELETE`) and verifies that any scoped tokens in use include `delete:organization`. - `reqToken()` is used to enforce auth for individual routes that require it. If a scoped token is not present for a request, `tokenRequiresScopes()` will not return an error ## TODO - [x] Alphabetize scope categories - [x] Change 'public repos only' to a radio button (private vs public). Also expand this to organizations - [X] Disable token creation if no scopes selected. Alternatively, show warning - [x] `reqToken()` is missing from many `POST/DELETE` routes in the api. `tokenRequiresScopes()` only checks that a given token has the correct scope, `reqToken()` must be used to check that a token (or some other auth) is present. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] The migration should be reviewed very carefully in order to minimize access changes to existing user tokens. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] Link to api to swagger documentation, clarify what read/write/delete levels correspond to - [x] Review cases where more than one scope is needed as this directly deviates from the api definition. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - For example: ```go m.Group("/users/{username}/orgs", func() { m.Get("", reqToken(), org.ListUserOrgs) m.Get("/{org}/permissions", reqToken(), org.GetUserOrgsPermissions) }, tokenRequiresScopes(auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryUser, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization), context_service.UserAssignmentAPI()) ``` ## Future improvements - [ ] Add required scopes to swagger documentation - [ ] Redesign `reqToken()` to be opt-out rather than opt-in - [ ] Subdivide scopes like `repository` - [ ] Once a token is created, if it has no scopes, we should display text instead of an empty bullet point - [ ] If the 'public repos only' option is selected, should read categories be selected by default Closes #24501 Closes #24799 Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jon@allspice.io> Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-04 20:57:16 +02:00
testCtx := NewAPITestContext(t, username, "initial-always-parent", auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteRepository, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteUser)
t.Run("CreateRepository", doAPICreateRepository(testCtx, false))
t.Run("CreateCRUDFile-ParentSigned", crudActionCreateFile(
t, testCtx, user, "master", "parentsigned", "signed-parent.txt", func(t *testing.T, response api.FileResponse) {
assert.True(t, response.Verification.Verified)
if !response.Verification.Verified {
t.FailNow()
return
}
assert.Equal(t, "gitea@fake.local", response.Verification.Signer.Email)
}))
})
setting.Repository.Signing.CRUDActions = []string{"always"}
t.Run("AlwaysSign-Initial-CRUD-Always", func(t *testing.T) {
defer tests.PrintCurrentTest(t)()
Redesign Scoped Access Tokens (#24767) ## Changes - Adds the following high level access scopes, each with `read` and `write` levels: - `activitypub` - `admin` (hidden if user is not a site admin) - `misc` - `notification` - `organization` - `package` - `issue` - `repository` - `user` - Adds new middleware function `tokenRequiresScopes()` in addition to `reqToken()` - `tokenRequiresScopes()` is used for each high-level api section - _if_ a scoped token is present, checks that the required scope is included based on the section and HTTP method - `reqToken()` is used for individual routes - checks that required authentication is present (but does not check scope levels as this will already have been handled by `tokenRequiresScopes()` - Adds migration to convert old scoped access tokens to the new set of scopes - Updates the user interface for scope selection ### User interface example <img width="903" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 55 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/654766ec-2143-4f59-9037-3b51600e32f3"> <img width="917" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 43 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/1ad64081-012c-4a73-b393-66b30352654c"> ## tokenRequiresScopes Design Decision - `tokenRequiresScopes()` was added to more reliably cover api routes. For an incoming request, this function uses the given scope category (say `AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization`) and the HTTP method (say `DELETE`) and verifies that any scoped tokens in use include `delete:organization`. - `reqToken()` is used to enforce auth for individual routes that require it. If a scoped token is not present for a request, `tokenRequiresScopes()` will not return an error ## TODO - [x] Alphabetize scope categories - [x] Change 'public repos only' to a radio button (private vs public). Also expand this to organizations - [X] Disable token creation if no scopes selected. Alternatively, show warning - [x] `reqToken()` is missing from many `POST/DELETE` routes in the api. `tokenRequiresScopes()` only checks that a given token has the correct scope, `reqToken()` must be used to check that a token (or some other auth) is present. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] The migration should be reviewed very carefully in order to minimize access changes to existing user tokens. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] Link to api to swagger documentation, clarify what read/write/delete levels correspond to - [x] Review cases where more than one scope is needed as this directly deviates from the api definition. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - For example: ```go m.Group("/users/{username}/orgs", func() { m.Get("", reqToken(), org.ListUserOrgs) m.Get("/{org}/permissions", reqToken(), org.GetUserOrgsPermissions) }, tokenRequiresScopes(auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryUser, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization), context_service.UserAssignmentAPI()) ``` ## Future improvements - [ ] Add required scopes to swagger documentation - [ ] Redesign `reqToken()` to be opt-out rather than opt-in - [ ] Subdivide scopes like `repository` - [ ] Once a token is created, if it has no scopes, we should display text instead of an empty bullet point - [ ] If the 'public repos only' option is selected, should read categories be selected by default Closes #24501 Closes #24799 Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jon@allspice.io> Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-04 20:57:16 +02:00
testCtx := NewAPITestContext(t, username, "initial-always-always", auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteRepository, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteUser)
t.Run("CreateRepository", doAPICreateRepository(testCtx, false))
t.Run("CreateCRUDFile-Always", crudActionCreateFile(
t, testCtx, user, "master", "always", "signed-always.txt", func(t *testing.T, response api.FileResponse) {
assert.True(t, response.Verification.Verified)
if !response.Verification.Verified {
t.FailNow()
return
}
assert.Equal(t, "gitea@fake.local", response.Verification.Signer.Email)
}))
})
setting.Repository.Signing.Merges = []string{"commitssigned"}
t.Run("UnsignedMerging", func(t *testing.T) {
defer tests.PrintCurrentTest(t)()
Redesign Scoped Access Tokens (#24767) ## Changes - Adds the following high level access scopes, each with `read` and `write` levels: - `activitypub` - `admin` (hidden if user is not a site admin) - `misc` - `notification` - `organization` - `package` - `issue` - `repository` - `user` - Adds new middleware function `tokenRequiresScopes()` in addition to `reqToken()` - `tokenRequiresScopes()` is used for each high-level api section - _if_ a scoped token is present, checks that the required scope is included based on the section and HTTP method - `reqToken()` is used for individual routes - checks that required authentication is present (but does not check scope levels as this will already have been handled by `tokenRequiresScopes()` - Adds migration to convert old scoped access tokens to the new set of scopes - Updates the user interface for scope selection ### User interface example <img width="903" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 55 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/654766ec-2143-4f59-9037-3b51600e32f3"> <img width="917" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 43 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/1ad64081-012c-4a73-b393-66b30352654c"> ## tokenRequiresScopes Design Decision - `tokenRequiresScopes()` was added to more reliably cover api routes. For an incoming request, this function uses the given scope category (say `AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization`) and the HTTP method (say `DELETE`) and verifies that any scoped tokens in use include `delete:organization`. - `reqToken()` is used to enforce auth for individual routes that require it. If a scoped token is not present for a request, `tokenRequiresScopes()` will not return an error ## TODO - [x] Alphabetize scope categories - [x] Change 'public repos only' to a radio button (private vs public). Also expand this to organizations - [X] Disable token creation if no scopes selected. Alternatively, show warning - [x] `reqToken()` is missing from many `POST/DELETE` routes in the api. `tokenRequiresScopes()` only checks that a given token has the correct scope, `reqToken()` must be used to check that a token (or some other auth) is present. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] The migration should be reviewed very carefully in order to minimize access changes to existing user tokens. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] Link to api to swagger documentation, clarify what read/write/delete levels correspond to - [x] Review cases where more than one scope is needed as this directly deviates from the api definition. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - For example: ```go m.Group("/users/{username}/orgs", func() { m.Get("", reqToken(), org.ListUserOrgs) m.Get("/{org}/permissions", reqToken(), org.GetUserOrgsPermissions) }, tokenRequiresScopes(auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryUser, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization), context_service.UserAssignmentAPI()) ``` ## Future improvements - [ ] Add required scopes to swagger documentation - [ ] Redesign `reqToken()` to be opt-out rather than opt-in - [ ] Subdivide scopes like `repository` - [ ] Once a token is created, if it has no scopes, we should display text instead of an empty bullet point - [ ] If the 'public repos only' option is selected, should read categories be selected by default Closes #24501 Closes #24799 Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jon@allspice.io> Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-04 20:57:16 +02:00
testCtx := NewAPITestContext(t, username, "initial-unsigned", auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteRepository, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteUser)
t.Run("CreatePullRequest", func(t *testing.T) {
pr, err := doAPICreatePullRequest(testCtx, testCtx.Username, testCtx.Reponame, "master", "never2")(t)
assert.NoError(t, err)
t.Run("MergePR", doAPIMergePullRequest(testCtx, testCtx.Username, testCtx.Reponame, pr.Index))
})
t.Run("CheckMasterBranchUnsigned", doAPIGetBranch(testCtx, "master", func(t *testing.T, branch api.Branch) {
assert.NotNil(t, branch.Commit)
assert.NotNil(t, branch.Commit.Verification)
assert.False(t, branch.Commit.Verification.Verified)
assert.Empty(t, branch.Commit.Verification.Signature)
Sign merges, CRUD, Wiki and Repository initialisation with gpg key (#7631) This PR fixes #7598 by providing a configurable way of signing commits across the Gitea instance. Per repository configurability and import/generation of trusted secure keys is not provided by this PR - from a security PoV that's probably impossible to do properly. Similarly web-signing, that is asking the user to sign something, is not implemented - this could be done at a later stage however. ## Features - [x] If commit.gpgsign is set in .gitconfig sign commits and files created through repofiles. (merges should already have been signed.) - [x] Verify commits signed with the default gpg as valid - [x] Signer, Committer and Author can all be different - [x] Allow signer to be arbitrarily different - We still require the key to have an activated email on Gitea. A more complete implementation would be to use a keyserver and mark external-or-unactivated with an "unknown" trust level icon. - [x] Add a signing-key.gpg endpoint to get the default gpg pub key if available - Rather than add a fake web-flow user I've added this as an endpoint on /api/v1/signing-key.gpg - [x] Try to match the default key with a user on gitea - this is done at verification time - [x] Make things configurable? - app.ini configuration done - [x] when checking commits are signed need to check if they're actually verifiable too - [x] Add documentation I have decided that adjusting the docker to create a default gpg key is not the correct thing to do and therefore have not implemented this.
2019-10-16 15:42:42 +02:00
}))
})
setting.Repository.Signing.Merges = []string{"basesigned"}
t.Run("BaseSignedMerging", func(t *testing.T) {
defer tests.PrintCurrentTest(t)()
Redesign Scoped Access Tokens (#24767) ## Changes - Adds the following high level access scopes, each with `read` and `write` levels: - `activitypub` - `admin` (hidden if user is not a site admin) - `misc` - `notification` - `organization` - `package` - `issue` - `repository` - `user` - Adds new middleware function `tokenRequiresScopes()` in addition to `reqToken()` - `tokenRequiresScopes()` is used for each high-level api section - _if_ a scoped token is present, checks that the required scope is included based on the section and HTTP method - `reqToken()` is used for individual routes - checks that required authentication is present (but does not check scope levels as this will already have been handled by `tokenRequiresScopes()` - Adds migration to convert old scoped access tokens to the new set of scopes - Updates the user interface for scope selection ### User interface example <img width="903" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 55 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/654766ec-2143-4f59-9037-3b51600e32f3"> <img width="917" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 43 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/1ad64081-012c-4a73-b393-66b30352654c"> ## tokenRequiresScopes Design Decision - `tokenRequiresScopes()` was added to more reliably cover api routes. For an incoming request, this function uses the given scope category (say `AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization`) and the HTTP method (say `DELETE`) and verifies that any scoped tokens in use include `delete:organization`. - `reqToken()` is used to enforce auth for individual routes that require it. If a scoped token is not present for a request, `tokenRequiresScopes()` will not return an error ## TODO - [x] Alphabetize scope categories - [x] Change 'public repos only' to a radio button (private vs public). Also expand this to organizations - [X] Disable token creation if no scopes selected. Alternatively, show warning - [x] `reqToken()` is missing from many `POST/DELETE` routes in the api. `tokenRequiresScopes()` only checks that a given token has the correct scope, `reqToken()` must be used to check that a token (or some other auth) is present. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] The migration should be reviewed very carefully in order to minimize access changes to existing user tokens. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] Link to api to swagger documentation, clarify what read/write/delete levels correspond to - [x] Review cases where more than one scope is needed as this directly deviates from the api definition. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - For example: ```go m.Group("/users/{username}/orgs", func() { m.Get("", reqToken(), org.ListUserOrgs) m.Get("/{org}/permissions", reqToken(), org.GetUserOrgsPermissions) }, tokenRequiresScopes(auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryUser, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization), context_service.UserAssignmentAPI()) ``` ## Future improvements - [ ] Add required scopes to swagger documentation - [ ] Redesign `reqToken()` to be opt-out rather than opt-in - [ ] Subdivide scopes like `repository` - [ ] Once a token is created, if it has no scopes, we should display text instead of an empty bullet point - [ ] If the 'public repos only' option is selected, should read categories be selected by default Closes #24501 Closes #24799 Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jon@allspice.io> Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-04 20:57:16 +02:00
testCtx := NewAPITestContext(t, username, "initial-unsigned", auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteRepository, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteUser)
t.Run("CreatePullRequest", func(t *testing.T) {
pr, err := doAPICreatePullRequest(testCtx, testCtx.Username, testCtx.Reponame, "master", "parentsigned2")(t)
assert.NoError(t, err)
t.Run("MergePR", doAPIMergePullRequest(testCtx, testCtx.Username, testCtx.Reponame, pr.Index))
})
t.Run("CheckMasterBranchUnsigned", doAPIGetBranch(testCtx, "master", func(t *testing.T, branch api.Branch) {
assert.NotNil(t, branch.Commit)
assert.NotNil(t, branch.Commit.Verification)
assert.False(t, branch.Commit.Verification.Verified)
assert.Empty(t, branch.Commit.Verification.Signature)
Sign merges, CRUD, Wiki and Repository initialisation with gpg key (#7631) This PR fixes #7598 by providing a configurable way of signing commits across the Gitea instance. Per repository configurability and import/generation of trusted secure keys is not provided by this PR - from a security PoV that's probably impossible to do properly. Similarly web-signing, that is asking the user to sign something, is not implemented - this could be done at a later stage however. ## Features - [x] If commit.gpgsign is set in .gitconfig sign commits and files created through repofiles. (merges should already have been signed.) - [x] Verify commits signed with the default gpg as valid - [x] Signer, Committer and Author can all be different - [x] Allow signer to be arbitrarily different - We still require the key to have an activated email on Gitea. A more complete implementation would be to use a keyserver and mark external-or-unactivated with an "unknown" trust level icon. - [x] Add a signing-key.gpg endpoint to get the default gpg pub key if available - Rather than add a fake web-flow user I've added this as an endpoint on /api/v1/signing-key.gpg - [x] Try to match the default key with a user on gitea - this is done at verification time - [x] Make things configurable? - app.ini configuration done - [x] when checking commits are signed need to check if they're actually verifiable too - [x] Add documentation I have decided that adjusting the docker to create a default gpg key is not the correct thing to do and therefore have not implemented this.
2019-10-16 15:42:42 +02:00
}))
})
setting.Repository.Signing.Merges = []string{"commitssigned"}
t.Run("CommitsSignedMerging", func(t *testing.T) {
defer tests.PrintCurrentTest(t)()
Redesign Scoped Access Tokens (#24767) ## Changes - Adds the following high level access scopes, each with `read` and `write` levels: - `activitypub` - `admin` (hidden if user is not a site admin) - `misc` - `notification` - `organization` - `package` - `issue` - `repository` - `user` - Adds new middleware function `tokenRequiresScopes()` in addition to `reqToken()` - `tokenRequiresScopes()` is used for each high-level api section - _if_ a scoped token is present, checks that the required scope is included based on the section and HTTP method - `reqToken()` is used for individual routes - checks that required authentication is present (but does not check scope levels as this will already have been handled by `tokenRequiresScopes()` - Adds migration to convert old scoped access tokens to the new set of scopes - Updates the user interface for scope selection ### User interface example <img width="903" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 55 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/654766ec-2143-4f59-9037-3b51600e32f3"> <img width="917" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 43 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/1ad64081-012c-4a73-b393-66b30352654c"> ## tokenRequiresScopes Design Decision - `tokenRequiresScopes()` was added to more reliably cover api routes. For an incoming request, this function uses the given scope category (say `AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization`) and the HTTP method (say `DELETE`) and verifies that any scoped tokens in use include `delete:organization`. - `reqToken()` is used to enforce auth for individual routes that require it. If a scoped token is not present for a request, `tokenRequiresScopes()` will not return an error ## TODO - [x] Alphabetize scope categories - [x] Change 'public repos only' to a radio button (private vs public). Also expand this to organizations - [X] Disable token creation if no scopes selected. Alternatively, show warning - [x] `reqToken()` is missing from many `POST/DELETE` routes in the api. `tokenRequiresScopes()` only checks that a given token has the correct scope, `reqToken()` must be used to check that a token (or some other auth) is present. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] The migration should be reviewed very carefully in order to minimize access changes to existing user tokens. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] Link to api to swagger documentation, clarify what read/write/delete levels correspond to - [x] Review cases where more than one scope is needed as this directly deviates from the api definition. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - For example: ```go m.Group("/users/{username}/orgs", func() { m.Get("", reqToken(), org.ListUserOrgs) m.Get("/{org}/permissions", reqToken(), org.GetUserOrgsPermissions) }, tokenRequiresScopes(auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryUser, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization), context_service.UserAssignmentAPI()) ``` ## Future improvements - [ ] Add required scopes to swagger documentation - [ ] Redesign `reqToken()` to be opt-out rather than opt-in - [ ] Subdivide scopes like `repository` - [ ] Once a token is created, if it has no scopes, we should display text instead of an empty bullet point - [ ] If the 'public repos only' option is selected, should read categories be selected by default Closes #24501 Closes #24799 Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jon@allspice.io> Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-04 20:57:16 +02:00
testCtx := NewAPITestContext(t, username, "initial-unsigned", auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteRepository, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteUser)
t.Run("CreatePullRequest", func(t *testing.T) {
pr, err := doAPICreatePullRequest(testCtx, testCtx.Username, testCtx.Reponame, "master", "always-parentsigned")(t)
assert.NoError(t, err)
t.Run("MergePR", doAPIMergePullRequest(testCtx, testCtx.Username, testCtx.Reponame, pr.Index))
})
t.Run("CheckMasterBranchUnsigned", doAPIGetBranch(testCtx, "master", func(t *testing.T, branch api.Branch) {
assert.NotNil(t, branch.Commit)
assert.NotNil(t, branch.Commit.Verification)
assert.True(t, branch.Commit.Verification.Verified)
Sign merges, CRUD, Wiki and Repository initialisation with gpg key (#7631) This PR fixes #7598 by providing a configurable way of signing commits across the Gitea instance. Per repository configurability and import/generation of trusted secure keys is not provided by this PR - from a security PoV that's probably impossible to do properly. Similarly web-signing, that is asking the user to sign something, is not implemented - this could be done at a later stage however. ## Features - [x] If commit.gpgsign is set in .gitconfig sign commits and files created through repofiles. (merges should already have been signed.) - [x] Verify commits signed with the default gpg as valid - [x] Signer, Committer and Author can all be different - [x] Allow signer to be arbitrarily different - We still require the key to have an activated email on Gitea. A more complete implementation would be to use a keyserver and mark external-or-unactivated with an "unknown" trust level icon. - [x] Add a signing-key.gpg endpoint to get the default gpg pub key if available - Rather than add a fake web-flow user I've added this as an endpoint on /api/v1/signing-key.gpg - [x] Try to match the default key with a user on gitea - this is done at verification time - [x] Make things configurable? - app.ini configuration done - [x] when checking commits are signed need to check if they're actually verifiable too - [x] Add documentation I have decided that adjusting the docker to create a default gpg key is not the correct thing to do and therefore have not implemented this.
2019-10-16 15:42:42 +02:00
}))
})
})
Sign merges, CRUD, Wiki and Repository initialisation with gpg key (#7631) This PR fixes #7598 by providing a configurable way of signing commits across the Gitea instance. Per repository configurability and import/generation of trusted secure keys is not provided by this PR - from a security PoV that's probably impossible to do properly. Similarly web-signing, that is asking the user to sign something, is not implemented - this could be done at a later stage however. ## Features - [x] If commit.gpgsign is set in .gitconfig sign commits and files created through repofiles. (merges should already have been signed.) - [x] Verify commits signed with the default gpg as valid - [x] Signer, Committer and Author can all be different - [x] Allow signer to be arbitrarily different - We still require the key to have an activated email on Gitea. A more complete implementation would be to use a keyserver and mark external-or-unactivated with an "unknown" trust level icon. - [x] Add a signing-key.gpg endpoint to get the default gpg pub key if available - Rather than add a fake web-flow user I've added this as an endpoint on /api/v1/signing-key.gpg - [x] Try to match the default key with a user on gitea - this is done at verification time - [x] Make things configurable? - app.ini configuration done - [x] when checking commits are signed need to check if they're actually verifiable too - [x] Add documentation I have decided that adjusting the docker to create a default gpg key is not the correct thing to do and therefore have not implemented this.
2019-10-16 15:42:42 +02:00
}
func crudActionCreateFile(t *testing.T, ctx APITestContext, user *user_model.User, from, to, path string, callback ...func(*testing.T, api.FileResponse)) func(*testing.T) {
Sign merges, CRUD, Wiki and Repository initialisation with gpg key (#7631) This PR fixes #7598 by providing a configurable way of signing commits across the Gitea instance. Per repository configurability and import/generation of trusted secure keys is not provided by this PR - from a security PoV that's probably impossible to do properly. Similarly web-signing, that is asking the user to sign something, is not implemented - this could be done at a later stage however. ## Features - [x] If commit.gpgsign is set in .gitconfig sign commits and files created through repofiles. (merges should already have been signed.) - [x] Verify commits signed with the default gpg as valid - [x] Signer, Committer and Author can all be different - [x] Allow signer to be arbitrarily different - We still require the key to have an activated email on Gitea. A more complete implementation would be to use a keyserver and mark external-or-unactivated with an "unknown" trust level icon. - [x] Add a signing-key.gpg endpoint to get the default gpg pub key if available - Rather than add a fake web-flow user I've added this as an endpoint on /api/v1/signing-key.gpg - [x] Try to match the default key with a user on gitea - this is done at verification time - [x] Make things configurable? - app.ini configuration done - [x] when checking commits are signed need to check if they're actually verifiable too - [x] Add documentation I have decided that adjusting the docker to create a default gpg key is not the correct thing to do and therefore have not implemented this.
2019-10-16 15:42:42 +02:00
return doAPICreateFile(ctx, path, &api.CreateFileOptions{
FileOptions: api.FileOptions{
BranchName: from,
NewBranchName: to,
Message: fmt.Sprintf("from:%s to:%s path:%s", from, to, path),
Author: api.Identity{
Name: user.FullName,
Email: user.Email,
},
Committer: api.Identity{
Name: user.FullName,
Email: user.Email,
},
},
ContentBase64: base64.StdEncoding.EncodeToString([]byte(fmt.Sprintf("This is new text for %s", path))),
Sign merges, CRUD, Wiki and Repository initialisation with gpg key (#7631) This PR fixes #7598 by providing a configurable way of signing commits across the Gitea instance. Per repository configurability and import/generation of trusted secure keys is not provided by this PR - from a security PoV that's probably impossible to do properly. Similarly web-signing, that is asking the user to sign something, is not implemented - this could be done at a later stage however. ## Features - [x] If commit.gpgsign is set in .gitconfig sign commits and files created through repofiles. (merges should already have been signed.) - [x] Verify commits signed with the default gpg as valid - [x] Signer, Committer and Author can all be different - [x] Allow signer to be arbitrarily different - We still require the key to have an activated email on Gitea. A more complete implementation would be to use a keyserver and mark external-or-unactivated with an "unknown" trust level icon. - [x] Add a signing-key.gpg endpoint to get the default gpg pub key if available - Rather than add a fake web-flow user I've added this as an endpoint on /api/v1/signing-key.gpg - [x] Try to match the default key with a user on gitea - this is done at verification time - [x] Make things configurable? - app.ini configuration done - [x] when checking commits are signed need to check if they're actually verifiable too - [x] Add documentation I have decided that adjusting the docker to create a default gpg key is not the correct thing to do and therefore have not implemented this.
2019-10-16 15:42:42 +02:00
}, callback...)
}
func importTestingKey(tmpDir, name, email string) (*openpgp.Entity, error) {
if _, _, err := process.GetManager().Exec("gpg --import tests/integration/private-testing.key", "gpg", "--import", "tests/integration/private-testing.key"); err != nil {
Sign merges, CRUD, Wiki and Repository initialisation with gpg key (#7631) This PR fixes #7598 by providing a configurable way of signing commits across the Gitea instance. Per repository configurability and import/generation of trusted secure keys is not provided by this PR - from a security PoV that's probably impossible to do properly. Similarly web-signing, that is asking the user to sign something, is not implemented - this could be done at a later stage however. ## Features - [x] If commit.gpgsign is set in .gitconfig sign commits and files created through repofiles. (merges should already have been signed.) - [x] Verify commits signed with the default gpg as valid - [x] Signer, Committer and Author can all be different - [x] Allow signer to be arbitrarily different - We still require the key to have an activated email on Gitea. A more complete implementation would be to use a keyserver and mark external-or-unactivated with an "unknown" trust level icon. - [x] Add a signing-key.gpg endpoint to get the default gpg pub key if available - Rather than add a fake web-flow user I've added this as an endpoint on /api/v1/signing-key.gpg - [x] Try to match the default key with a user on gitea - this is done at verification time - [x] Make things configurable? - app.ini configuration done - [x] when checking commits are signed need to check if they're actually verifiable too - [x] Add documentation I have decided that adjusting the docker to create a default gpg key is not the correct thing to do and therefore have not implemented this.
2019-10-16 15:42:42 +02:00
return nil, err
}
keyringFile, err := os.Open("tests/integration/private-testing.key")
Sign merges, CRUD, Wiki and Repository initialisation with gpg key (#7631) This PR fixes #7598 by providing a configurable way of signing commits across the Gitea instance. Per repository configurability and import/generation of trusted secure keys is not provided by this PR - from a security PoV that's probably impossible to do properly. Similarly web-signing, that is asking the user to sign something, is not implemented - this could be done at a later stage however. ## Features - [x] If commit.gpgsign is set in .gitconfig sign commits and files created through repofiles. (merges should already have been signed.) - [x] Verify commits signed with the default gpg as valid - [x] Signer, Committer and Author can all be different - [x] Allow signer to be arbitrarily different - We still require the key to have an activated email on Gitea. A more complete implementation would be to use a keyserver and mark external-or-unactivated with an "unknown" trust level icon. - [x] Add a signing-key.gpg endpoint to get the default gpg pub key if available - Rather than add a fake web-flow user I've added this as an endpoint on /api/v1/signing-key.gpg - [x] Try to match the default key with a user on gitea - this is done at verification time - [x] Make things configurable? - app.ini configuration done - [x] when checking commits are signed need to check if they're actually verifiable too - [x] Add documentation I have decided that adjusting the docker to create a default gpg key is not the correct thing to do and therefore have not implemented this.
2019-10-16 15:42:42 +02:00
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
defer keyringFile.Close()
Sign merges, CRUD, Wiki and Repository initialisation with gpg key (#7631) This PR fixes #7598 by providing a configurable way of signing commits across the Gitea instance. Per repository configurability and import/generation of trusted secure keys is not provided by this PR - from a security PoV that's probably impossible to do properly. Similarly web-signing, that is asking the user to sign something, is not implemented - this could be done at a later stage however. ## Features - [x] If commit.gpgsign is set in .gitconfig sign commits and files created through repofiles. (merges should already have been signed.) - [x] Verify commits signed with the default gpg as valid - [x] Signer, Committer and Author can all be different - [x] Allow signer to be arbitrarily different - We still require the key to have an activated email on Gitea. A more complete implementation would be to use a keyserver and mark external-or-unactivated with an "unknown" trust level icon. - [x] Add a signing-key.gpg endpoint to get the default gpg pub key if available - Rather than add a fake web-flow user I've added this as an endpoint on /api/v1/signing-key.gpg - [x] Try to match the default key with a user on gitea - this is done at verification time - [x] Make things configurable? - app.ini configuration done - [x] when checking commits are signed need to check if they're actually verifiable too - [x] Add documentation I have decided that adjusting the docker to create a default gpg key is not the correct thing to do and therefore have not implemented this.
2019-10-16 15:42:42 +02:00
block, err := armor.Decode(keyringFile)
Sign merges, CRUD, Wiki and Repository initialisation with gpg key (#7631) This PR fixes #7598 by providing a configurable way of signing commits across the Gitea instance. Per repository configurability and import/generation of trusted secure keys is not provided by this PR - from a security PoV that's probably impossible to do properly. Similarly web-signing, that is asking the user to sign something, is not implemented - this could be done at a later stage however. ## Features - [x] If commit.gpgsign is set in .gitconfig sign commits and files created through repofiles. (merges should already have been signed.) - [x] Verify commits signed with the default gpg as valid - [x] Signer, Committer and Author can all be different - [x] Allow signer to be arbitrarily different - We still require the key to have an activated email on Gitea. A more complete implementation would be to use a keyserver and mark external-or-unactivated with an "unknown" trust level icon. - [x] Add a signing-key.gpg endpoint to get the default gpg pub key if available - Rather than add a fake web-flow user I've added this as an endpoint on /api/v1/signing-key.gpg - [x] Try to match the default key with a user on gitea - this is done at verification time - [x] Make things configurable? - app.ini configuration done - [x] when checking commits are signed need to check if they're actually verifiable too - [x] Add documentation I have decided that adjusting the docker to create a default gpg key is not the correct thing to do and therefore have not implemented this.
2019-10-16 15:42:42 +02:00
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
keyring, err := openpgp.ReadKeyRing(block.Body)
if err != nil {
return nil, fmt.Errorf("Keyring access failed: '%w'", err)
Sign merges, CRUD, Wiki and Repository initialisation with gpg key (#7631) This PR fixes #7598 by providing a configurable way of signing commits across the Gitea instance. Per repository configurability and import/generation of trusted secure keys is not provided by this PR - from a security PoV that's probably impossible to do properly. Similarly web-signing, that is asking the user to sign something, is not implemented - this could be done at a later stage however. ## Features - [x] If commit.gpgsign is set in .gitconfig sign commits and files created through repofiles. (merges should already have been signed.) - [x] Verify commits signed with the default gpg as valid - [x] Signer, Committer and Author can all be different - [x] Allow signer to be arbitrarily different - We still require the key to have an activated email on Gitea. A more complete implementation would be to use a keyserver and mark external-or-unactivated with an "unknown" trust level icon. - [x] Add a signing-key.gpg endpoint to get the default gpg pub key if available - Rather than add a fake web-flow user I've added this as an endpoint on /api/v1/signing-key.gpg - [x] Try to match the default key with a user on gitea - this is done at verification time - [x] Make things configurable? - app.ini configuration done - [x] when checking commits are signed need to check if they're actually verifiable too - [x] Add documentation I have decided that adjusting the docker to create a default gpg key is not the correct thing to do and therefore have not implemented this.
2019-10-16 15:42:42 +02:00
}
// There should only be one entity in this file.
return keyring[0], nil
Sign merges, CRUD, Wiki and Repository initialisation with gpg key (#7631) This PR fixes #7598 by providing a configurable way of signing commits across the Gitea instance. Per repository configurability and import/generation of trusted secure keys is not provided by this PR - from a security PoV that's probably impossible to do properly. Similarly web-signing, that is asking the user to sign something, is not implemented - this could be done at a later stage however. ## Features - [x] If commit.gpgsign is set in .gitconfig sign commits and files created through repofiles. (merges should already have been signed.) - [x] Verify commits signed with the default gpg as valid - [x] Signer, Committer and Author can all be different - [x] Allow signer to be arbitrarily different - We still require the key to have an activated email on Gitea. A more complete implementation would be to use a keyserver and mark external-or-unactivated with an "unknown" trust level icon. - [x] Add a signing-key.gpg endpoint to get the default gpg pub key if available - Rather than add a fake web-flow user I've added this as an endpoint on /api/v1/signing-key.gpg - [x] Try to match the default key with a user on gitea - this is done at verification time - [x] Make things configurable? - app.ini configuration done - [x] when checking commits are signed need to check if they're actually verifiable too - [x] Add documentation I have decided that adjusting the docker to create a default gpg key is not the correct thing to do and therefore have not implemented this.
2019-10-16 15:42:42 +02:00
}