2023-05-25 15:17:19 +02:00
|
|
|
// Copyright 2023 The Gitea Authors. All rights reserved.
|
|
|
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
package integration
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
import (
|
|
|
|
|
"fmt"
|
|
|
|
|
"net/http"
|
|
|
|
|
"testing"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
auth_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/auth"
|
|
|
|
|
issues_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/issues"
|
|
|
|
|
repo_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/repo"
|
|
|
|
|
"code.gitea.io/gitea/models/unittest"
|
|
|
|
|
user_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/user"
|
|
|
|
|
api "code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/structs"
|
|
|
|
|
"code.gitea.io/gitea/tests"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
|
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func TestAPIPinIssue(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
|
defer tests.PrepareTestEnv(t)()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.NoError(t, unittest.LoadFixtures())
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
repo := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &repo_model.Repository{ID: 1})
|
|
|
|
|
issue := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.Issue{RepoID: repo.ID})
|
|
|
|
|
owner := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: repo.OwnerID})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
session := loginUser(t, owner.Name)
|
Redesign Scoped Access Tokens (#24767)
## Changes
- Adds the following high level access scopes, each with `read` and
`write` levels:
- `activitypub`
- `admin` (hidden if user is not a site admin)
- `misc`
- `notification`
- `organization`
- `package`
- `issue`
- `repository`
- `user`
- Adds new middleware function `tokenRequiresScopes()` in addition to
`reqToken()`
- `tokenRequiresScopes()` is used for each high-level api section
- _if_ a scoped token is present, checks that the required scope is
included based on the section and HTTP method
- `reqToken()` is used for individual routes
- checks that required authentication is present (but does not check
scope levels as this will already have been handled by
`tokenRequiresScopes()`
- Adds migration to convert old scoped access tokens to the new set of
scopes
- Updates the user interface for scope selection
### User interface example
<img width="903" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 55 PM"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/654766ec-2143-4f59-9037-3b51600e32f3">
<img width="917" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 43 PM"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/1ad64081-012c-4a73-b393-66b30352654c">
## tokenRequiresScopes Design Decision
- `tokenRequiresScopes()` was added to more reliably cover api routes.
For an incoming request, this function uses the given scope category
(say `AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization`) and the HTTP method (say
`DELETE`) and verifies that any scoped tokens in use include
`delete:organization`.
- `reqToken()` is used to enforce auth for individual routes that
require it. If a scoped token is not present for a request,
`tokenRequiresScopes()` will not return an error
## TODO
- [x] Alphabetize scope categories
- [x] Change 'public repos only' to a radio button (private vs public).
Also expand this to organizations
- [X] Disable token creation if no scopes selected. Alternatively, show
warning
- [x] `reqToken()` is missing from many `POST/DELETE` routes in the api.
`tokenRequiresScopes()` only checks that a given token has the correct
scope, `reqToken()` must be used to check that a token (or some other
auth) is present.
- _This should be addressed in this PR_
- [x] The migration should be reviewed very carefully in order to
minimize access changes to existing user tokens.
- _This should be addressed in this PR_
- [x] Link to api to swagger documentation, clarify what
read/write/delete levels correspond to
- [x] Review cases where more than one scope is needed as this directly
deviates from the api definition.
- _This should be addressed in this PR_
- For example:
```go
m.Group("/users/{username}/orgs", func() {
m.Get("", reqToken(), org.ListUserOrgs)
m.Get("/{org}/permissions", reqToken(), org.GetUserOrgsPermissions)
}, tokenRequiresScopes(auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryUser,
auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization),
context_service.UserAssignmentAPI())
```
## Future improvements
- [ ] Add required scopes to swagger documentation
- [ ] Redesign `reqToken()` to be opt-out rather than opt-in
- [ ] Subdivide scopes like `repository`
- [ ] Once a token is created, if it has no scopes, we should display
text instead of an empty bullet point
- [ ] If the 'public repos only' option is selected, should read
categories be selected by default
Closes #24501
Closes #24799
Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jon@allspice.io>
Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-04 20:57:16 +02:00
|
|
|
token := getTokenForLoggedInUser(t, session, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteIssue)
|
2023-05-25 15:17:19 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Pin the Issue
|
2023-12-22 00:59:59 +01:00
|
|
|
req := NewRequest(t, "POST", fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/issues/%d/pin", repo.OwnerName, repo.Name, issue.Index)).
|
|
|
|
|
AddTokenAuth(token)
|
2023-05-25 15:17:19 +02:00
|
|
|
MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusNoContent)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Check if the Issue is pinned
|
2023-12-22 00:59:59 +01:00
|
|
|
req = NewRequest(t, "GET", fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/issues/%d", repo.OwnerName, repo.Name, issue.Index))
|
2023-05-25 15:17:19 +02:00
|
|
|
resp := MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
|
|
|
|
|
var issueAPI api.Issue
|
|
|
|
|
DecodeJSON(t, resp, &issueAPI)
|
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(t, 1, issueAPI.PinOrder)
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func TestAPIUnpinIssue(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
|
defer tests.PrepareTestEnv(t)()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.NoError(t, unittest.LoadFixtures())
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
repo := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &repo_model.Repository{ID: 1})
|
|
|
|
|
issue := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.Issue{RepoID: repo.ID})
|
|
|
|
|
owner := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: repo.OwnerID})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
session := loginUser(t, owner.Name)
|
Redesign Scoped Access Tokens (#24767)
## Changes
- Adds the following high level access scopes, each with `read` and
`write` levels:
- `activitypub`
- `admin` (hidden if user is not a site admin)
- `misc`
- `notification`
- `organization`
- `package`
- `issue`
- `repository`
- `user`
- Adds new middleware function `tokenRequiresScopes()` in addition to
`reqToken()`
- `tokenRequiresScopes()` is used for each high-level api section
- _if_ a scoped token is present, checks that the required scope is
included based on the section and HTTP method
- `reqToken()` is used for individual routes
- checks that required authentication is present (but does not check
scope levels as this will already have been handled by
`tokenRequiresScopes()`
- Adds migration to convert old scoped access tokens to the new set of
scopes
- Updates the user interface for scope selection
### User interface example
<img width="903" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 55 PM"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/654766ec-2143-4f59-9037-3b51600e32f3">
<img width="917" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 43 PM"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/1ad64081-012c-4a73-b393-66b30352654c">
## tokenRequiresScopes Design Decision
- `tokenRequiresScopes()` was added to more reliably cover api routes.
For an incoming request, this function uses the given scope category
(say `AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization`) and the HTTP method (say
`DELETE`) and verifies that any scoped tokens in use include
`delete:organization`.
- `reqToken()` is used to enforce auth for individual routes that
require it. If a scoped token is not present for a request,
`tokenRequiresScopes()` will not return an error
## TODO
- [x] Alphabetize scope categories
- [x] Change 'public repos only' to a radio button (private vs public).
Also expand this to organizations
- [X] Disable token creation if no scopes selected. Alternatively, show
warning
- [x] `reqToken()` is missing from many `POST/DELETE` routes in the api.
`tokenRequiresScopes()` only checks that a given token has the correct
scope, `reqToken()` must be used to check that a token (or some other
auth) is present.
- _This should be addressed in this PR_
- [x] The migration should be reviewed very carefully in order to
minimize access changes to existing user tokens.
- _This should be addressed in this PR_
- [x] Link to api to swagger documentation, clarify what
read/write/delete levels correspond to
- [x] Review cases where more than one scope is needed as this directly
deviates from the api definition.
- _This should be addressed in this PR_
- For example:
```go
m.Group("/users/{username}/orgs", func() {
m.Get("", reqToken(), org.ListUserOrgs)
m.Get("/{org}/permissions", reqToken(), org.GetUserOrgsPermissions)
}, tokenRequiresScopes(auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryUser,
auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization),
context_service.UserAssignmentAPI())
```
## Future improvements
- [ ] Add required scopes to swagger documentation
- [ ] Redesign `reqToken()` to be opt-out rather than opt-in
- [ ] Subdivide scopes like `repository`
- [ ] Once a token is created, if it has no scopes, we should display
text instead of an empty bullet point
- [ ] If the 'public repos only' option is selected, should read
categories be selected by default
Closes #24501
Closes #24799
Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jon@allspice.io>
Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-04 20:57:16 +02:00
|
|
|
token := getTokenForLoggedInUser(t, session, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteIssue)
|
2023-05-25 15:17:19 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Pin the Issue
|
2023-12-22 00:59:59 +01:00
|
|
|
req := NewRequest(t, "POST", fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/issues/%d/pin", repo.OwnerName, repo.Name, issue.Index)).
|
|
|
|
|
AddTokenAuth(token)
|
2023-05-25 15:17:19 +02:00
|
|
|
MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusNoContent)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Check if the Issue is pinned
|
2023-12-22 00:59:59 +01:00
|
|
|
req = NewRequest(t, "GET", fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/issues/%d", repo.OwnerName, repo.Name, issue.Index))
|
2023-05-25 15:17:19 +02:00
|
|
|
resp := MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
|
|
|
|
|
var issueAPI api.Issue
|
|
|
|
|
DecodeJSON(t, resp, &issueAPI)
|
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(t, 1, issueAPI.PinOrder)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Unpin the Issue
|
2023-12-22 00:59:59 +01:00
|
|
|
req = NewRequest(t, "DELETE", fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/issues/%d/pin", repo.OwnerName, repo.Name, issue.Index)).
|
|
|
|
|
AddTokenAuth(token)
|
2023-05-25 15:17:19 +02:00
|
|
|
MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusNoContent)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Check if the Issue is no longer pinned
|
2023-12-22 00:59:59 +01:00
|
|
|
req = NewRequest(t, "GET", fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/issues/%d", repo.OwnerName, repo.Name, issue.Index))
|
2023-05-25 15:17:19 +02:00
|
|
|
resp = MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
|
|
|
|
|
DecodeJSON(t, resp, &issueAPI)
|
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(t, 0, issueAPI.PinOrder)
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func TestAPIMoveIssuePin(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
|
defer tests.PrepareTestEnv(t)()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.NoError(t, unittest.LoadFixtures())
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
repo := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &repo_model.Repository{ID: 1})
|
|
|
|
|
issue := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.Issue{RepoID: repo.ID})
|
|
|
|
|
issue2 := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.Issue{ID: 2, RepoID: repo.ID})
|
|
|
|
|
owner := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: repo.OwnerID})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
session := loginUser(t, owner.Name)
|
Redesign Scoped Access Tokens (#24767)
## Changes
- Adds the following high level access scopes, each with `read` and
`write` levels:
- `activitypub`
- `admin` (hidden if user is not a site admin)
- `misc`
- `notification`
- `organization`
- `package`
- `issue`
- `repository`
- `user`
- Adds new middleware function `tokenRequiresScopes()` in addition to
`reqToken()`
- `tokenRequiresScopes()` is used for each high-level api section
- _if_ a scoped token is present, checks that the required scope is
included based on the section and HTTP method
- `reqToken()` is used for individual routes
- checks that required authentication is present (but does not check
scope levels as this will already have been handled by
`tokenRequiresScopes()`
- Adds migration to convert old scoped access tokens to the new set of
scopes
- Updates the user interface for scope selection
### User interface example
<img width="903" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 55 PM"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/654766ec-2143-4f59-9037-3b51600e32f3">
<img width="917" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 43 PM"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/1ad64081-012c-4a73-b393-66b30352654c">
## tokenRequiresScopes Design Decision
- `tokenRequiresScopes()` was added to more reliably cover api routes.
For an incoming request, this function uses the given scope category
(say `AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization`) and the HTTP method (say
`DELETE`) and verifies that any scoped tokens in use include
`delete:organization`.
- `reqToken()` is used to enforce auth for individual routes that
require it. If a scoped token is not present for a request,
`tokenRequiresScopes()` will not return an error
## TODO
- [x] Alphabetize scope categories
- [x] Change 'public repos only' to a radio button (private vs public).
Also expand this to organizations
- [X] Disable token creation if no scopes selected. Alternatively, show
warning
- [x] `reqToken()` is missing from many `POST/DELETE` routes in the api.
`tokenRequiresScopes()` only checks that a given token has the correct
scope, `reqToken()` must be used to check that a token (or some other
auth) is present.
- _This should be addressed in this PR_
- [x] The migration should be reviewed very carefully in order to
minimize access changes to existing user tokens.
- _This should be addressed in this PR_
- [x] Link to api to swagger documentation, clarify what
read/write/delete levels correspond to
- [x] Review cases where more than one scope is needed as this directly
deviates from the api definition.
- _This should be addressed in this PR_
- For example:
```go
m.Group("/users/{username}/orgs", func() {
m.Get("", reqToken(), org.ListUserOrgs)
m.Get("/{org}/permissions", reqToken(), org.GetUserOrgsPermissions)
}, tokenRequiresScopes(auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryUser,
auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization),
context_service.UserAssignmentAPI())
```
## Future improvements
- [ ] Add required scopes to swagger documentation
- [ ] Redesign `reqToken()` to be opt-out rather than opt-in
- [ ] Subdivide scopes like `repository`
- [ ] Once a token is created, if it has no scopes, we should display
text instead of an empty bullet point
- [ ] If the 'public repos only' option is selected, should read
categories be selected by default
Closes #24501
Closes #24799
Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jon@allspice.io>
Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-04 20:57:16 +02:00
|
|
|
token := getTokenForLoggedInUser(t, session, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteIssue)
|
2023-05-25 15:17:19 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Pin the first Issue
|
2023-12-22 00:59:59 +01:00
|
|
|
req := NewRequest(t, "POST", fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/issues/%d/pin", repo.OwnerName, repo.Name, issue.Index)).
|
|
|
|
|
AddTokenAuth(token)
|
2023-05-25 15:17:19 +02:00
|
|
|
MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusNoContent)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Check if the first Issue is pinned at position 1
|
2023-12-22 00:59:59 +01:00
|
|
|
req = NewRequest(t, "GET", fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/issues/%d", repo.OwnerName, repo.Name, issue.Index))
|
2023-05-25 15:17:19 +02:00
|
|
|
resp := MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
|
|
|
|
|
var issueAPI api.Issue
|
|
|
|
|
DecodeJSON(t, resp, &issueAPI)
|
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(t, 1, issueAPI.PinOrder)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Pin the second Issue
|
2023-12-22 00:59:59 +01:00
|
|
|
req = NewRequest(t, "POST", fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/issues/%d/pin", repo.OwnerName, repo.Name, issue2.Index)).
|
|
|
|
|
AddTokenAuth(token)
|
2023-05-25 15:17:19 +02:00
|
|
|
MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusNoContent)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Move the first Issue to position 2
|
2023-12-22 00:59:59 +01:00
|
|
|
req = NewRequest(t, "PATCH", fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/issues/%d/pin/2", repo.OwnerName, repo.Name, issue.Index)).
|
|
|
|
|
AddTokenAuth(token)
|
2023-05-25 15:17:19 +02:00
|
|
|
MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusNoContent)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Check if the first Issue is pinned at position 2
|
2023-12-22 00:59:59 +01:00
|
|
|
req = NewRequest(t, "GET", fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/issues/%d", repo.OwnerName, repo.Name, issue.Index))
|
2023-05-25 15:17:19 +02:00
|
|
|
resp = MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
|
|
|
|
|
var issueAPI3 api.Issue
|
|
|
|
|
DecodeJSON(t, resp, &issueAPI3)
|
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(t, 2, issueAPI3.PinOrder)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Check if the second Issue is pinned at position 1
|
2023-12-22 00:59:59 +01:00
|
|
|
req = NewRequest(t, "GET", fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/issues/%d", repo.OwnerName, repo.Name, issue2.Index))
|
2023-05-25 15:17:19 +02:00
|
|
|
resp = MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
|
|
|
|
|
var issueAPI4 api.Issue
|
|
|
|
|
DecodeJSON(t, resp, &issueAPI4)
|
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(t, 1, issueAPI4.PinOrder)
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func TestAPIListPinnedIssues(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
|
defer tests.PrepareTestEnv(t)()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.NoError(t, unittest.LoadFixtures())
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
repo := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &repo_model.Repository{ID: 1})
|
|
|
|
|
issue := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.Issue{RepoID: repo.ID})
|
|
|
|
|
owner := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: repo.OwnerID})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
session := loginUser(t, owner.Name)
|
Redesign Scoped Access Tokens (#24767)
## Changes
- Adds the following high level access scopes, each with `read` and
`write` levels:
- `activitypub`
- `admin` (hidden if user is not a site admin)
- `misc`
- `notification`
- `organization`
- `package`
- `issue`
- `repository`
- `user`
- Adds new middleware function `tokenRequiresScopes()` in addition to
`reqToken()`
- `tokenRequiresScopes()` is used for each high-level api section
- _if_ a scoped token is present, checks that the required scope is
included based on the section and HTTP method
- `reqToken()` is used for individual routes
- checks that required authentication is present (but does not check
scope levels as this will already have been handled by
`tokenRequiresScopes()`
- Adds migration to convert old scoped access tokens to the new set of
scopes
- Updates the user interface for scope selection
### User interface example
<img width="903" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 55 PM"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/654766ec-2143-4f59-9037-3b51600e32f3">
<img width="917" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 43 PM"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/1ad64081-012c-4a73-b393-66b30352654c">
## tokenRequiresScopes Design Decision
- `tokenRequiresScopes()` was added to more reliably cover api routes.
For an incoming request, this function uses the given scope category
(say `AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization`) and the HTTP method (say
`DELETE`) and verifies that any scoped tokens in use include
`delete:organization`.
- `reqToken()` is used to enforce auth for individual routes that
require it. If a scoped token is not present for a request,
`tokenRequiresScopes()` will not return an error
## TODO
- [x] Alphabetize scope categories
- [x] Change 'public repos only' to a radio button (private vs public).
Also expand this to organizations
- [X] Disable token creation if no scopes selected. Alternatively, show
warning
- [x] `reqToken()` is missing from many `POST/DELETE` routes in the api.
`tokenRequiresScopes()` only checks that a given token has the correct
scope, `reqToken()` must be used to check that a token (or some other
auth) is present.
- _This should be addressed in this PR_
- [x] The migration should be reviewed very carefully in order to
minimize access changes to existing user tokens.
- _This should be addressed in this PR_
- [x] Link to api to swagger documentation, clarify what
read/write/delete levels correspond to
- [x] Review cases where more than one scope is needed as this directly
deviates from the api definition.
- _This should be addressed in this PR_
- For example:
```go
m.Group("/users/{username}/orgs", func() {
m.Get("", reqToken(), org.ListUserOrgs)
m.Get("/{org}/permissions", reqToken(), org.GetUserOrgsPermissions)
}, tokenRequiresScopes(auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryUser,
auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization),
context_service.UserAssignmentAPI())
```
## Future improvements
- [ ] Add required scopes to swagger documentation
- [ ] Redesign `reqToken()` to be opt-out rather than opt-in
- [ ] Subdivide scopes like `repository`
- [ ] Once a token is created, if it has no scopes, we should display
text instead of an empty bullet point
- [ ] If the 'public repos only' option is selected, should read
categories be selected by default
Closes #24501
Closes #24799
Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jon@allspice.io>
Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-04 20:57:16 +02:00
|
|
|
token := getTokenForLoggedInUser(t, session, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteIssue)
|
2023-05-25 15:17:19 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Pin the Issue
|
2023-12-22 00:59:59 +01:00
|
|
|
req := NewRequest(t, "POST", fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/issues/%d/pin", repo.OwnerName, repo.Name, issue.Index)).
|
|
|
|
|
AddTokenAuth(token)
|
2023-05-25 15:17:19 +02:00
|
|
|
MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusNoContent)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Check if the Issue is in the List
|
2023-12-22 00:59:59 +01:00
|
|
|
req = NewRequest(t, "GET", fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/issues/pinned", repo.OwnerName, repo.Name))
|
2023-05-25 15:17:19 +02:00
|
|
|
resp := MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
|
|
|
|
|
var issueList []api.Issue
|
|
|
|
|
DecodeJSON(t, resp, &issueList)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(t, 1, len(issueList))
|
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(t, issue.ID, issueList[0].ID)
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func TestAPIListPinnedPullrequests(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
|
defer tests.PrepareTestEnv(t)()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.NoError(t, unittest.LoadFixtures())
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
repo := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &repo_model.Repository{ID: 1})
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-12-22 00:59:59 +01:00
|
|
|
req := NewRequest(t, "GET", fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/pulls/pinned", repo.OwnerName, repo.Name))
|
2023-05-25 15:17:19 +02:00
|
|
|
resp := MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
|
|
|
|
|
var prList []api.PullRequest
|
|
|
|
|
DecodeJSON(t, resp, &prList)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(t, 0, len(prList))
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func TestAPINewPinAllowed(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
|
defer tests.PrepareTestEnv(t)()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
repo := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &repo_model.Repository{ID: 1})
|
|
|
|
|
owner := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: repo.OwnerID})
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-12-22 00:59:59 +01:00
|
|
|
req := NewRequest(t, "GET", fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/new_pin_allowed", owner.Name, repo.Name))
|
2023-05-25 15:17:19 +02:00
|
|
|
resp := MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
var newPinsAllowed api.NewIssuePinsAllowed
|
|
|
|
|
DecodeJSON(t, resp, &newPinsAllowed)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.True(t, newPinsAllowed.Issues)
|
|
|
|
|
assert.True(t, newPinsAllowed.PullRequests)
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
